October 11, 2006

IN THIS ISSUE
EXTRA:
WSU Deans Discuss Medical School's Future
 DMC CEO Sounds Off On WSU Relationship

Dean Announces Oct. 17 Forum On DMC/WSU Issues
 

Click Here To Contact Us

 

WSU Deans Discuss Medical School's Future

By PAUL NATINSKY
Managing Editor


DMN sat down with Wayne State University Medical School Dean Robert Mentzer, MD, and Executive Vice Dean Robert Frank, MD, Sept. 11 in Dean Mentzer’s campus office. The two administrators discussed a variety of topics, including ongoing contract negotiations  with the Detroit Medical Center, the medical school’s overall regional strategy and its and its prospects for garnering federal research dollars as the National Institutes of Health revamps its grant-making strategy.

CONTRACT DIFFERENCES WITH THE DMC
The firestorm that has engulfed the relationship between the WSU School of Medicine and the Detroit Medical Center health system is a matter of two partners in medical education that have begun moving in different directions.

 The epicenter of conflict has been the dissolution of the orthopedic residency program at DMC. The conflict is complicated and has resulted in deliberative policy resolutions at the state and national level. Resolutions to both the MSMS and AMA Houses of Delegates appear at the end of this story.

 Ultimately, both the DMC and the WSU Medical School applied for separate residency programs in orthopedics. Those applications are still pending, but the flap over the residency combined with the long-delayed and often turbulent contract negotiations has drawn the scrutiny of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (the federal agency that accredits residency programs). The ACGME wants an update on the contract status between WSU and the DMC by Oct. 1 and has moved its site visit up from next spring to Nov. 14, said Dean Mentzer. Dr. Mentzer is hopeful and “cautiously optimistic” about being able to report progress.

 NEW DIRECTIONS
As contentious as it is, the orthopedic residency situation is only the tip of the iceberg. The DMC has been WSU’s full sponsorship partner in about 90 percent of the medical school’s residency programs for a number of years, said Dean Mentzer. While some universities own hospitals and use them as clinical partners for residencies and many hospitals have freestanding residency programs, it is unusual for a medical school and hospital to jointly control residency programs. Not only is it unusual, but, said Dean Mentzer, the ACGME prefers programs be run by a single entity.

That, said Dean Mentzer, is where WSU would like to go. He views the DMC’s approach to medical education as increasingly “corporate” and favors a more educationally oriented focus.

To avoid future conflicts, Dean Mentzer and the medical school will insist on being the sole sponsor for any new residency programs it initiates. The medical school intends to seek new affiliations, not, said Dean Mentzer, to alienate longtime partner DMC, but to gain the flexibility of educating students wherever it feels the environment is best.

Dean Mentzer is concerned that about further problems with the DMC impeding that quest.

“To give you an example, the dilemma that we face right now. We had a site visit for a cardiothoracic surgery residency training program that currently exists (at DMC), and because the volume is insufficient to demonstrate a satisfactory educational experience at the DMC, we originally had an agreement to expand the program to include Oakwood – not replace (the DMC component). It would have expanded the program to multiple partners, but not replaced it.

“About two or three days prior to the site visit from the residency review committee from thoracic surgery, the DMC indicated that they would not approve the additional site – that they felt that residents would somehow compromise the competitive nature of the corporate perspective of the DMC’s corporate goal to establish a cardiovascular center, a heart center here on the campus of DMC.

“So we’re in the awkward situation of having worked out all the agreements to expand the program and enhance its strength as an application to the ACGME and at the last minute it was decided that somehow the educational program would influence the economic interests of the hospital, competitive stance of the hospital; and so that support was withdrawn.

“We did have to indicate to the site visitors our vulnerabilities in terms of the educational experience. Now, we’ll have to wait and see how that plays itself out.”

The medical school’s regional, multi-partner approach is not only in synch with the ACGME’s leanings; it is a firmly established philosophy that the medical school has employed in educating its undergraduate medical students.

“Many years ago with a medical school this size it became obvious that we needed to develop educational partners at the undergraduate level,” said Dean Frank. “For years it was just the medical school, Receiving Hospital, Harper – this is before they formed the DMC. When the DMC was formed, it even made things a little easier. Over time, partly because of numbers, but partly because of issues that come up this way, it became obvious that we had opportunities to form great partnerships with hospitals in the tri-county area.

“First of all, many of the teaching faculty in those hospitals who were teaching residents were our own graduates. As these opportunities presented themselves, we started signing teaching agreements with Beaumont and Providence and these other places on the undergraduate level. (while keeping the residencies at the DMC at that time)

“My point is there is that this model that served us very well in the undergraduate situation was something that going forward I think we just continue to build on. Now every single hospital system in the whole area has Wayne State medical students there. It’s a great educational experience.

“It’s something we’re comfortable with, we’ve been doing it for years.”

A NEW ROADMAP
The regional philosophy also dovetails with the medical school ’s approach to securing funding under the National Institutes of Health Roadmap, a complete reorganization of the agency’s distribution of more than $8 billion in annual research grants.

The NIH’s new paradigm is that research should be made “translational,” or be brought from the laboratory to being a standard of care in a very expeditious manner. To this end, said Dean Mentzer, the NIH will look toward research institutions that cast wide regional nets with clinical collaborators such as health systems. He feels the WSU Medical School is well positioned for that, although there is some work to do.

WSU is seeking funding for a planning grant and is a year-and-a-half to two years away from submitting for a formal award.

But the university, outside of the medical school, is fully supportive of effort regarding NIH. There is a commitment to fund the award application with university funds if the planning grant is not awarded.

Said Dean Mentzer: “I think we are right on the bubble. We are well poised in the sense that we have multiple health care systems, we are the only medical school in one city in the context of a metropolitan area of 5 million people. There is clearly a need because of the health care disparities that exist in the city right now, that if we can pull these resources together, we can help address these problems in a timely manner and simultaneously have an impact on the economy in this region.”

RESIDENCY RESOLUTIONS
The WCMSSM introduced a resolution which was adopted by the MSMS House of Delegates in April of 2006 on the issue of sudden closure of residency programs. The resolved sections stated:

That MSMS publicly advocate and provide professional support for residents/fellows in the event of training program closure; and be it further

That MSMS hold training programs and sponsoring institutions publicly accountable when they fail to immediately notify residents of pending closures and promptly transfer residents to alternate accredited programs as soon as feasible with the least disruption to training; and be it further

That the Michigan Delegation to the AMA ask the AMA to work with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and other appropriate organizations to advocate for the development and implementation of effective policies to permit graduate medical education funding to follow the displaced resident physician from a closing to a receiving residency program, in the event of temporary or permanent residency program closure.

As the result of the passage of this resolution and its introduction at the AMA meeting in June of 2006, the House of Delegates at the AMA’s Annual Meeting adopted a similar resolution:

AMA work closely with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to contribute to, review and comment on any new ACGME policies related to residency closures, regardless of cause.

AMA work with the American Board of Medical Specialties to encourage all its member certifying boards to develop a mechanism to accommodate the discontinuities in training which arise from residency closures, regardless of cause, including waiving continuity care requirements and granting residents credit for partial years of training.

AMA work with the ACGME to monitor closing programs, including encouraging programs to immediately notify residents of pending closures and to promptly transfer residents to alternate accredited programs as soon as feasible with the least disruption to training; and strongly encourage programs which accept transferred residents to minimize extensions to total training time.

AMA use the National GME Census and work with the ACGME to assess how much disruption occurred in the training of residents as a result of program closures caused by Hurricane Katrina and report back  at the 2009 Annual Meeting with further recommendations.

AMA work with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), ACGME, and other appropriate organizations to advocate for the development and implementation of effective policies to permit graduate medical education funding to follow the resident physician from a closing to the receiving residency program (including waivers of CMS caps), in the event of temporary or permanent residency program closure.

Back to top


 

DMC CEO Sounds Off On WSU Relationship

Editor’s note: The following is the text of an e-mail sent to Detroit Medical Center employees October 9; it was obtained by DMN on that date. The DMC was contacted, informed that the e-mail would be published in an e-edition October 11 and asked for further comment. DMC CEO Mike Duggan declined further comment.

Dear DMC Employees

With the recent newspaper articles, I'm getting questions daily from DMC employees about the Wayne State contract. Let me try to tell you directly what's going on and what's at stake.

The financial situation at the DMC has stabilized. 2006 will be the third straight year in the black, something DMC hasn't accomplished since the 1980s. Things are going to be tight for us until the Michigan economy improves, but we've come a long way in a short period of time.

The DMC Board leadership and I have tried hard with three different Deans in the last two years to get an agreement with WSU. WSU tries to cover with innocent sounding terms like "diversifying" and "suburban strategy," but the cold truth is WSU has already abandoned its historic DMC partnership. WSU is aggressively building a fleet of lifeboats, establishing numerous suburban hospital contracts so their doctors can one day jump ship and float off into a sea of better payer mix, taking their insured patients with them. Most WSU doctors seem to find this plan distasteful, but it is being pushed with full force by the WSU administration. 

At the end of the day, DMC's decision comes down to this choice: 

Do we side with the WSU administration demanding huge payments from DMC while they build new programs at other hospitals who want to take our patients?

Or, do we side with all those doctors, nurses, aides, techs, transport workers, administrators, and other staff who are 100 percent loyal to the DMC and whose jobs could be lost if the WSU doctors took DMC market share away to their new partners at Oakwood and Providence?

To me, it's not a difficult choice. I have never in my life been treated with the warmth and kindness that I have received from DMC employees the last few years. I couldn't be more pleased that the DMC Board just extended my contract three more years through 2009, because the work here is far from done. My proudest accomplishment is the fact DMC stopped the annual cycle of layoffs and instead has actually hired 3,000 new employees in the last three years. We can't afford a WSU contract that jeopardizes those jobs.

When I came to the DMC, I didn't come as an experienced hospital administrator, but as a lifelong Detroiter who understood two principles about our region that would determine whether DMC would survive:

1)  If people have a choice between the same service either downtown or near their home, they will choose to stay near home; and

2)  If the service provided downtown is truly unique, people will pour in by the thousands from 50 miles or more.

My first e-mail to employees in 2004 shocked some when I told you I wanted to scrap my predecessor's plan to close Detroit hospitals. I wrote of the great success of the Fox Theatre, UD High School, the casinos, Joe Louis Arena, and Greektown. I truly believed we could save our own great institutions by building unique programs to bring patients back to Detroit. The DMC employees supported this vision with tremendous energy as we cleaned up the appearance of our campus, improved hospital services, and recruited key doctors. 

Those who were here in late 2004 will remember how patients responded, pouring back onto our central campus in such numbers that our parking structures were overwhelmed and we had cars backed up into the streets and parked on sidewalks.  It was a remarkable turnaround and showed that you don't need to build new hospitals in Novi to attract patients. But you do have to offer a level of care patients can't get in Novi.

Many employees don't understand the DMC/WSU contractual relationship, but in principle, it's pretty simple. The original partnership between DMC and WSU was formed in 1980 by visionaries who truly understood how to get patients to come  Downtown. 

The partnership involved four major commitments DMC made to WSU doctors:

1)  WSU received one of the largest financial payments of any medical school in America

2)  Exclusive right to positions of medical leadership in all downtown hospitals

3)  Exclusive right to provide many hospital services at all DMC hospitals (ER, Radiology, Anesthesiology, etc.)

4)  A partnership that allowed WSU to run 69 residency training programs at DMC. 

It was a lot to give up, but what DMC got in exchange was a commitment of loyalty that WSU would build a great and unique academic medical center at DMC. While the relationship had many contentious issues, those fundamental principles survived essentially intact for 25 years, until WSU embarked on its recent suburban strategy.

What does that contract mean to WSU today? The 700 WSU physicians and their practice groups and employees now earn in excess of $200 million a year from DMC:  $80 million paid directly by DMC and another $120 million in physician fees earned at DMC hospitals.  It remains one of the largest, if not the largest, financial packages received by any medical school practice group from any hospital system in America. And DMC has offered to increase that amount in each of the next three years.

WSU keeps claiming DMC is exaggerating the risk from WSU's competing programs, so judge for yourself. WSU's suburban strategy is only in its infancy, yet here are proposals WSU either already has proposed or actually concluded:

1)  A joint surgery center with Oakwood just three miles from DMC's MIOSH hospital; 2)  New teaching and clinical partnerships with Crittenton and Providence

3)  The purchase of a massive office building in Troy-the former Saturn

World Headquarters-to be the center of the WSU Medical practice. The Saturn Building is larger than all the space occupied by WSU doctors at DMC today.

4)  A comprehensive affiliation with Oakwood to provide a range of specialty services. Oakwood is already promoting itself in the suburbs as the place to get Wayne State specialty services without having to go downtown.

5)  The Dean's office promised Oakwood that pediatricians from Children's would run Oakwood's pediatrics unit. Children's today is the dominant hospital in the Dearborn market, getting more than 50 percent of the pediatric hospital admissions. Children's would stand to lose significant patient volume if Oakwood is able to tell Dearborn parents they have the same doctors as Children's.

Are we exaggerating in being concerned? Could DMC jobs or hospitals be at risk if WSU kept making these kinds of deals with our competitors for the next three years? 

Now, here's the really astonishing part. In its last written proposal two weeks ago, WSU demanded a new three-year contract with all the same services and preferential contracts at DMC hospitals they have today. Then, WSU wanted an $8 million annual increase in contract payments from DMC. And then WSU demanded the total freedom to keep making all these partnerships with the other hospitals.  They are demanding that DMC finance its own demise and they pretend to the rest of the world like they can't understand why the DMC Board and I won't just sign it. Here's the good news: the DMC management team is about the most talented group of people I've ever been around. They're working 18- hour days developing contingency plans and we're gaining confidence that DMC is going to come out of this stronger than we are today. We know this isn't nearly as difficult a crisis as we faced in 2004.

Our plans are being developed based on the same principles that got us out of bankruptcy in 2004.  If a group's proposal builds a unique medical program at DMC, we will strongly back it. If a group's proposal is designed to take DMC's money while they build programs at our competitors, we will reject it and we'll work to replace them with a group that will build uniquely at DMC.

Interestingly, the process is having the unexpected benefit of naturally sorting out the gripers and malcontents who are choosing to leave on their own. There will be a lot of pain and anxiety during the transition and DMC will probably look quite a bit different than it does today. At the end of the day, I really believe we will be stronger because we're going to have a medical staff that truly wants to be here. And that really would be priceless.

It's 1 a.m. Monday and this is probably too long already. I'll do a separate piece on the residency issues shortly.

Mike

Back to top


Dean Mentzer Announces Oct. 17 Forum on DMC/WSU Issues
WSU/DMC Negotiations: Update Forum on Tues., Oct. 17 @ 5:00 p.m.

Dear Colleagues:

Since the first of this month, I have received many questions about the status of the School of Medicine's negotiations with the Detroit Medical Center. I am writing to provide you with a brief update on our continued talks, and to invite you to join me for a session on Tues., Oct. 17 at 5 p.m. in Scott Hall's Blue Auditorium to answer your questions, face to face.

As you are aware, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) will be conducting an on-site institutional review of our GME programs on Nov. 14. The ACGME knows that the contract supporting the joint graduate medical education programs expires on Dec. 31, 2006, and has not yet been renewed. The immediate and rightful concerns of the ACGME are the stability of our training programs and the well being of the residents and fellows for whom we share responsibility.

On Oct. 1, the School of Medicine and the DMC notified the ACGME that good faith negotiations were underway and would continue until an agreement was reached. Wayne State University and the School of Medicine remain committed to continuing good faith negotiations to ensure the continuity of programs sited at our downtown home, and within the scope of our longstanding affiliation with the DMC.

As I have affirmed on many occasions, the School's commitment to the city of Detroit and its partnership with the DMC are central to our mission, and will remain so. Although the School of Medicine relies upon longstanding and essential partnerships with numerous health care institutions to train one of the nation's largest medical school classes, our education, research, and clinical care programs are inextricably linked to the city of Detroit and its unique demographics.

WSU's more than 700 faculty physicians are responsible for approximately 65 percent of DMC's revenues, and deliver about 80 percent of all care delivered to the DMC's uninsured and underinsured patients. About 30 percent of all practicing physicians in Michigan received all or part of their medical training at WSU/DMC. Of the city of Detroit's 690 primary care physicians, 350, or 40 percent, are WSU/DMC resident physicians-in-training.

Detroit is the School of Medicine's home: WSU has committed to capital investment of $200 million over the next five years in two new facilities on its downtown campus - the Richard J. Mazurek, MD, Medical Education Commons and a new state-of-the-science multidisciplinary research building that will house the University's evolving Center for Clinical and Translational Science. In fact, these facilities will be catalysts for centering regional education; and clinical translational research activities at our downtown site.

As you may know, the School's student body is the most diverse in the nation; we graduate more African-American and Arab-American physicians than any of our 125 peer United States medical schools, and rank among the top five for training African-American physicians who go on to become university faculty. Our interdisciplinary research programs are targeted to the diverse metropolitan population that we serve and are recognized as national models of excellence. These programs include cancer, maternal and child health, and health care disparities, and are the foundation of the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute and the WSU Center for African-American Urban Health. The School and the DMC collaborate on these and many other programs.

In summary, I assure you that Wayne State University and its School of Medicine are steadfastly committed to each of the following:

* Continuing our valued relationship with the DMC;
* Expanding our presence in the city of Detroit;
* Upholding our mission of delivering the highest quality patient
   care supported by education and research;
* Educating our students and training our residents and fellows
   in the best possible teaching environments;
* Recruiting and retaining leading physicians to teach our
   students and serve our community;
* Providing care to the region's uninsured and underinsured

As talks with the DMC continue to evolve, it is important that you are updated with accurate information. To that end, I will be hosting a forum on Tues., Oct. 17 at 5 p.m. in Scott Hall's Blue Auditorium. Please join me then for a briefing, followed by a question and answer session.

I look forward to seeing you on Oct. 17.

Sincerely,

Robert M. Mentzer, Jr., MD
Dean, School of Medicine
Senior Advisor to the President for Medical Affairs
Wayne State University
 

Back to top



This publication brought to you by Natinsky Publishing Network.

Problems seeing this email? You may view it online at http://www.wcmssm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter contact
info@wcmssm.org