|
August 13, 2007 |
|
IN THIS ISSUE
Editor's Column: Patient-Focused Compensation System
Udow To
Direct Center For Health Care Quality
Oakwood Honors
Fitzgerald
NPI Update
Cancer Walk
Unbalanced SCHIP Bill Favors Some Hospitals
Retail Clinics Continue Growth Amid Mounting
Concerns |
|
Click Here To Contact Us

|
|
Editor's Column: Patient-Focused Compensation
System
By JOSEPH
WEISS, MD
Summertime is when medical meetings and agendas go into hibernation.
But the cessation of that labor is not complete. Work continues on
developing an alternative to the present medical malpractice system.
Specifically,
effort is going to refine the present no-fault concept to ready it
for the fall/winter term of the Michigan Legislature. An important
aspect of that preparation is changing the name of the no-fault bill
MSMS will introduce. The new name is The Patient-Focused
Compensation Act.
The name
change is important. It focuses on features of the bill that
incorporate timeliness, reasonable compensation, an emphasis on
error rather than fault, a response to injury rather than a chance
for revenge and provides a means for appeal if either patient or
physician believes the decision is unfair.
Lawyers
familiar with the malpractice environment in Michigan say the
present tort reform laws suffice to give physicians the protection
the profession needs to ward off frivolous lawsuits. However, the
point of the MSMS initiative resides in the new name of the act. The
thrust is to extend equal protection to patients against the law’s
delay and opportunity for equity in an instance of medical error.
Summertime,
and the living is easy, but the work of medical politics goes on:
not in smoke-filled, but in air-conditioned rooms.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back to top
|
Udow To Direct Center For Health Care
Quality
The board of directors of the joint venture between the University
of Michigan Health System and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan has
named Marianne Udow as the first director of the Center for
Healthcare Quality & Transformation, a joint venture dedicated to
improving the quality of Michigan's health care, and transforming
the way patient care is delivered in the state and beyond. Udow will
begin in September.
Udow will be an employee of
UMHS, which is
providing staffing for the Center.
BCBSM is
providing seed funding, allocating up to $10 million.
Udow is currently the director of the Michigan Department of Human
Services, a post she has held since being appointed by Gov. Granholm
in January 2004. From 1992 to 2004, she served in several executive
positions at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, including senior
vice president of health care products and provider services. She
was senior vice president of plans and operations at Mercy
Alternative and Care Choices from 1986 to 1988. She holds a master's
degree from the University of Michigan's School of Public Health.
The Center was created as part of the University of Michigan's sale
of its M-CARE health plan to
BCBSM and its
HMO
subsidiary, Blue Care Network, which was finalized on Dec. 31, 2006.
The sale terms included the creation of a separate joint venture
aimed at improving the quality, safety, efficiency and
appropriateness of health care in Michigan.
UMHS and
BCBSM are equal
partners in the venture.
The Center has already undertaken its first project, which is
evaluating the impact of lower prescription drug co-payments for
U-M
faculty, staff and dependents who have diabetes. The project is
evaluating how reducing costs influences participants' use of drugs
to control blood sugar, cholesterol, blood pressure and depression —
all important steps that may reduce their long-term health costs by
preventing or delaying kidney failure, nerve damage, cardiovascular
problems and blindness.
The Center board will meet regularly to consider potential areas of
health care that might be open to projects that will improve the
delivery of services, get the right care to the right person at the
right time, prevent medical errors, reduce risks, avoid unnecessary
treatment, or get more value for the dollars spent.
In the future, the Center will allow health experts from all areas
of U-M,
including UMHS,
and from other institutions, to pursue projects under contract with
the new entity. Blue Care Network and other
BCBSM
subsidiaries also will be closely involved with the work of the
Center. Any use of data for research will be under the jurisdiction
of the appropriate research-oversight process to protect patient
privacy and rights.
Results or findings of most of the projects commissioned by the
Center will be available to all health experts. The Center also may
endorse and promote programs and care delivery enhancements
developed through projects it fosters.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
Oakwood Honors Fitzgerald
Oakwood
Healthcare System (OHS) is paying tribute to longtime President and
Chief Executive Officer, Gerald D. Fitzgerald, by naming the
Surgical Pavilion at Oakwood Hospital & Medical Center (OHMC) the
“Fitzgerald Pavilion” to commemorate his retirement. Fitzgerald
dedicated 40 years of service to Oakwood, and in return, the
organization is dedicating its state-of-the-art surgical center in
his name.
“The Surgical
Pavilion & Heart and Vascular Center...is a true point of pride for
Oakwood and I can’t think of a better way to honor Jerry than to
dedicate this wonderful center in his name,” said Brian Connolly,
president and CEO, Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.
The Fitzgerald
Pavilion houses Oakwood’s Heart and Vascular Center and the Oakwood
Surgical Center. In addition to new signage reflecting the new name,
there is now a hand-painted portrait of Fitzgerald displayed in the
lobby of the Pavilion - visitors are welcome to enjoy the space and
view the portrait.
Fitzgerald
will continue to serve Oakwood as vice-chair of the OHI board of
directors.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back to
top
|
NPI Update
NPPES health
care provider data that are disclosable under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) will be disclosed to the public by the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). In accordance with
the e-FOIA Amendments, CMS will be disclosing these data via the
Internet. Data will be available in two forms:
-
A
query-only database, known as the NPI Registry.
-
A
downloadable file.
CMS is
extending the period of time in which enumerated health care
providers can view their FOIA-disclosable NPPES data and make any
edits they feel are necessary prior to our initial disclosure of the
data.
We must build
in time to resolve any errors or problems that may be encountered
with edits that health care providers submit. Therefore, in order
to ensure edits are reflected in the NPI Registry when it first
becomes operational and in the first downloadable file, health care
providers need to submit their edits no later than Monday, August
20, 2007. Health care providers who submit edits on paper need to
ensure that they are mailed in time for receipt by the NPI
Enumerator by that date.
CMS will be
making FOIA-disclosable NPPES health care provider data available
beginning Tuesday, September 4, 2007. The NPI Registry will become
operational on September 4 and the downloadable file will be ready
approximately one week later.
Some of the
key data elements that are FOIA-Disclosable are:
-
NPI
-
Entity
Type Code (1-Individual or 2-Organization)
-
Replacement NPI
-
Provider
Name (First Name, Middle Name, Last Name, Prefix, Suffix,
Credential(s), OR the Legal Business Name for Organizations)
-
Provider
Other Name (First Name, Middle Name, Last Name, OR ‘Doing
Business As’ Name, Former Legal Business Name, Other Name. for
Organizations)
-
Provider
Business Mailing Address (First line address, Second line
address, City, State, Postal Code, and Country Code if outside
U.S., Telephone Number, Fax Number)
-
Provider
Business Location Address (First line address, Second line
address, City, State, Postal Code, and Country Code if outside
U.S., Telephone Number, Fax Number)
-
Healthcare
Provider Taxonomy Code(s)
-
Other
Provider Identifier(s)
-
Other
Provider Identifier Type Code
-
Provider
Enumeration Date
-
Last
Update Date
-
NPI
Deactivation Reason Code
-
NPI
Deactivation Date
-
NPI
Reactivation Date
-
Provider
Gender Code
-
Provider
License Number
-
Provider
License Number State Code
-
Authorized
Official Contact Information (First Name, Middle Name, Last
Name, Title or Position, Telephone Number)
The delay in
the dissemination of NPPES data does not alter the requirement that
HIPAA covered entities must comply with the requirements of the NPI
Final Rule no later than May 23, 2008. All NPI contingencies that
may be in place must be lifted by that date.
Still Confused?
Not sure what an
NPI is and how
you can get it, share it and use it? As always, more information
and education on the NPI can be found through the CMS NPI page
www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalProvIdentStand on the CMS website.
Providers can apply for an NPI online at
https://nppes.cms.hhs.gov or can call the NPI enumerator to
request a paper application at 1-800-465-3203.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back to
top |
Cancer Walk
The 4th Annual NAAMA's Walk for Women's Cancer
New Date: Saturday, September 29th, 2007
Mark your calendar for Saturday, September 29, 2007 for the 4th
NAAMA's Walk for Women's Cancer.
This one mile non-competitive walk at the Detroit Zoo in Royal Oak,
Michigan was established in 2004 by the Michigan Chapter of the
National Arab American Medical Association (NAAMA) in partnership
with the Karmanos Cancer Center.
The walk is the first of its kind to target all women's cancer, and
one of the few to focus on ovarian and gynecological malignancies.
Its mission is to increase public awareness, support surviving
patients, honor memories of those lost and to create a community of
individuals and businesses dedicated to eradicating the concerns of
future generations.
Sponsorship revenue helps to underwrite the event expenses and along
with entry fees and donations will go directly towards supporting
Karmanos gynecological oncology clinic as well as funding community
focused services for women with cancer.
For details or to
sign up visit:
www.cancerwalk.org
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back to
top
|
Unbalanced SCHIP Bill Favors Some Hospitals
The House has "quietly funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to
specific hospitals and health care providers" under the SCHIP
reauthorization bill passed earlier this month, the
New York Times
reports (Pear, New York
Times, 8/12). The House SCHIP bill would reduce
payments to Medicare Advantage plans and increase the federal
cigarette tax by 45 cents per pack to increase funding for SCHIP by
about $50 billion over five years. The bill also would make a number
of revisions to Medicare (Kaiser
Daily Health Policy Report, 8/9).
According to a Times
review of the legislation, the House bill would "direct millions of
dollars a year to about 40 favored hospitals by increasing their
Medicare payments," mostly "at the request of Democratic lawmakers."
Many of the earmarks would reclassify suburban hospitals as located
in urban areas, which generally receive higher Medicare
reimbursements to cover higher wages for hospital workers, according
to the Times.
Although Democrats have promised greater transparency of earmarks
and other projects, the bill describes the hospitals "in cryptic
terms, so that identifying a beneficiary is like solving a riddle,"
the Times
reports.
House Ways and Means
Health Subcommittee Chair Pete Stark (D-Calif.) said that
increasing payments to some hospitals is a way for Congress to
improve "the equity and fairness" of Medicare reimbursements. Under
Medicare, "you are basically setting prices, and the system is
clumsy," Stark said.
Health Subcommittee ranking member Dave Camp (R-Mich.)
criticized a proposed adjustment that would reclassify
Bay Area Medical Center -- located on the border of Wisconsin
and Michigan -- as located in Chicago. Camp called the provision
"absurd on its face," adding, "Every hospital in America would like
to be reclassified" into a labor market with higher wages.
Nadeam Elshami, spokesperson for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.),
said, "It's easy to criticize individual provisions of large,
complex bills," but "the focus should be on the huge number of
uninsured children who will be eligible for life-saving health care
under our bill" (New York
Times, 8/12).
2008 Campaign
Efforts to pass SCHIP legislation provide "a glimpse into the
emerging 2008 campaign strategies of Republicans and Democrats" and
illustrate "some of the problems House Republicans face in their
first election cycle as the minority party," the
Times
reports.
A proposal in the House SCHIP bill that would reduce payments to MA
plans provides Republicans "an irresistible opening to go after
Democrats," according to the
Times. Former
Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) said, "When seniors find out what
is really going to happen [if payments to MA plans are cut], they
are not going to be happy." However, analysts and others "suggest
this could be a tough sell for Republicans" because Democrats "have
accumulated decades of credibility on Medicare while Republicans,
until recent years, were identified more as foes of the program,"
the Times reports.
In addition, Democrats "believe they can easily paint Republican
opponents of the measure ... as being against helping poor sick
kids," according to the
Times. Democrats also are "getting important political
cover" from
AARP, which supports expanding SCHIP, according to the
Times (Hulse,
New York Times,
8/11).
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back to
top |
Retail
Clinics Continue Growth Amid Mounting Concerns
Retail clinics -- low-cost, walk-in facilities often located in
supermarkets, pharmacies and large retail stores that in large part
are staffed by nurse practitioners -- are "fast becoming a serious
industry" in the United States., the
AP/Tennessean
reports. According to the
Convenient Care Association, which represents retail clinics, 7
percent of U.S. residents visited such facilities at least once,
with the rate expected to increase as the number of facilities
expands.
CCA estimates that the number of retail clinics will increase from
400 to more than 700 by the end of the year and to about 2,000 by
the end of 2008. In addition, about 40 percent to 50 percent of
clinics accept health insurance from
Aetna,
Humana,
UnitedHealth Group and other large companies, according to CCA.
Concerns
However, "concerns about quality of care are rising among
physicians, and some industry experts say the clinics' services need
to be more broad if they are going to have a big impact on reducing
overall health care costs," the
AP/Tennessean
reports (D'Innocenzio,
AP/Tennessean, 8/12). The
American Medical Association in June adopted a resolution to ask
state and federal agencies to launch investigations into whether
retail clinics place the health of patients at risk and whether the
facilities encourage patients to fill their prescription on site. In
addition, AMA will seek a ban on a practice in which health insurers
offer to waive or reduce copayments for members who seek care at
retail clinics (Kaiser
Daily Health Policy Report, 6/26).
A number of states have passed legislation to clarify the role of
nurse practitioners at retail clinics. In response to concerns about
the quality of care provided at retail clinics, Tine Hansen-Turten,
executive director of CCA, said that such facilities are monitored
by state nursing or medical boards or both. Michael Howe, president
and CEO of
MinuteClinic, added, "I wouldn't call it express care. I would
call it efficient care."
AMA has denied that "criticism of these clinics is being driven by
economic interests," but "there's no doubt that primary physicians
could lose some business as their insured patients go elsewhere for
minor ailments," according to the
AP/Tennessean (AP/Tennessean,
8/12).
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back to
top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

This publication brought to you by Natinsky
Publishing Network.
Problems seeing this email? You may view it online at http://www.wcmssm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter contact
info@wcmssm.org |
|