|
July 30, 2007
|
|
IN
THIS ISSUE
Editor's
Column: Will The Truth Set Us Free?
WSU,
Oakwood Bolster Partnership With Agreement
DMC
Named In Most Wired Hospitals Survey
Poll Positions
IT As Key To Health Care Quality, Efficiency
Rankings
And Report Cards
Dem
Pres Candidates Espouse Universal Coverage
Children's
Health Bill Could Undermine JCAHO
|
|
Click
Here To Contact Us

|
|
Editor's
Column: Will The Truth Set Us Free?
By
JOSEPH WEISS, MD
In the Saturday July 14, New York Times, on a front page article,
the public read that oncologists were withholding potentially lifesaving
anti-cancer drugs, Bexxar and Zevalin. According to the Times article,
the reason is that the drugs don’t provide physicians enough profit.
The growing public outrage that has the potential to shackle
the medical community is more dangerous to us than confinement
to a prison cell. The heat of public response threatens
to warp our integrity and bring congressional rebuke in
the form of legislative controls on our prescribing activities.
We need the AMA to rise to our defense. My discussions with
oncology colleagues leads me to question whether the problem
with Bexxar and Zevalin resides not with physician profit
but in governmental policies including unreasonable documentation
and uncertain reimbursement. Only the AMA has the resources
to assess the real role of the oncologists.
Furthermore, the present controversy over cancer care should
set in motion a long term AMA response. We need our foremost
organization to act with speed and justice now ; uncover for
us the truth that will set us free.
Turmoil
in medical care will only continue. We can count on facing
future accusations creating unwarranted public upset and inappropriate
government response. The oncology experience can serve us.
The AMA should use the episode to initiate a long-term policy
to safeguard our independence and defend our reputations.
Back
to top
|
|
WSU,
Oakwood Bolster Partnership With Agreement
Oakwood
Healthcare, Inc. and Wayne State University announced
an agreement late last week in which a total of 41 WSU
physicians and residents specializing in otolaryngology,
urology and dermatology have joined Oakwood Hospital & Medical
Center’s specialists who are currently providing exceptional
care. In addition, the WSU residents and physicians now
have access to Oakwood’s facilities and technology.
“Wayne State University is one of the premier academic medical schools in the
country, and we are excited to partner with them in providing a first-rate medical
education to the 41 new residents joining our ranks,” said Brian Connolly, president
and CEO, OHI. “Oakwood is proud of its long history of service, and with this
new partnership, we will be able to offer these exceptionally talented health
care professionals a high-quality place to practice medicine, while simultaneously
providing the communities we serve greater access to excellent health care.”
The
agreement will include undergraduate and graduate medical
education and basic, clinical and community-based research
and further the goal of both institutions to become an
academic health center of national renown.
“This
enhanced relationship with Oakwood provides us with a
partner that can collaborate with us on all three components
of our mission – education, research and patient care,” said
Robert M. Mentzer Jr., MD, dean of the Wayne State University
School of Medicine. “As the School of Medicine develops
its strategic plan for its future as a regional health
care partner, relationships like this will be vital to
our future.”
In
June of 2006, OHI and WSU signed an affiliation agreement
to create an academic and clinical care partnership.
This latest collaboration is another example of efforts
to create a long-term partnership between both institutions
that will result over time in the creation of programs
that support enhanced medical education, research and
clinical care.
Kerith
Spicknall, MD, is a WSU resident in Dermatology. Spicknall,
31, has been with Oakwood since September 2006, and is
pleased to have access to expert staff, an exceptional
surgical clinic and new laser technology; however, the
location is also a welcoming factor.
“I
live in Detroit, so I wasn’t really interested in being
shifted to a hospital that’s further in the suburbs.
I like Dearborn, I like where Oakwood is located,” said
Spicknall. “I think it’s very convenient, but at the
same time, it offers a whole subset of new patients in
a state-of-the-art and inviting atmosphere.”
With
the increase in medical staffing, OHMC will be able to
reduce the time it takes Oakwood patients to see a physician,
which will result in better patient outcomes and improved
patient satisfaction. Additionally, new technology allows
residents to explore many new and exciting aspects of
their careers in medicine.
“Having
access to high-tech equipment is good for the residency
training program because we’ll be using these new innovations
once we get out into the new world and practice on our
own,” said fifth-year Otolaryngology Chief Resident,
Giancarlo Zuliani, MD. “It’s really advantageous for
us to get experience with the technologies because patients
will want the newest and greatest and, as a physician,
you want to be able to provide those services.”
For
more information on Oakwood or WSU, visit www.oakwood.org and www.wayne.edu.
Back
to top
|
|
DMC
Named In Most Wired Hospital Survey
The
Detroit Medical Center has been named in the list of Most
Wired Hospitals and Health Systems according to the results
of the 2007 Most Wired Survey and Benchmarking Study released
July 17 in the July issue of Hospitals & Health Networks
magazine.
The Most Wired Survey is conducted annually by Hospitals & Health
Networks magazine, which uses the results to name the 100 Most Wired
hospitals and health systems. The nation’s 100 Most Wired hospitals
show better outcomes in four key areas: mortality rates, patient
safety measures from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ), core measures from Hospital Compare and average length of
stay. The survey focuses on how the nation’s hospitals use information
technologies for quality, customer service, public health and safety,
business processes and workforce issues. (The July H&HN cover
story detailing results is available at www.hhnmag.com.)
"The continued adoption of technology for clinical systems in health care
is driving rapid change and great outcomes,” said Lewis Redd, managing partner,
Accenture Health & Life Sciences North American Provider Practice and one
of the 2007 Survey sponsors. “The leaders in the field are already showing us
how technology can help connect hospitals with their patients and enhance clinical
outcomes. This survey is a call to action.”
Back
to top
|
|
Poll
Positions IT As Key To Health Care Quality, Efficiency
A
survey of health care leaders has found that when it comes
to improving health care quality, information technology
is the most important solution.
The
latest Commonwealth Fund/Modern Healthcare Opinion
Leaders Survey found that 66 percent of 214 policy leaders
believe that rapid adoption of electronic health records
and other IT systems is job No. 1 for solving the problem
of widespread inefficiency and uneven quality of care.
That was followed by public reporting of provider performance
on quality measures (59 percent) and financial incentives
for improved quality of care, such as pay-for-performance
programs (51 percent). Respondents were allowed to choose
more than one solution.
Seventy
percent of survey respondents say the federal government
should play a leading role in backing providers’ IT investments.
Another 58 percent say health plans and insurers have a
responsibility to support expansion.
Only
7 percent described the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement
Act of 2005, which allows providers to voluntarily report
medical errors and ensures the confidentiality of physicians
and hospitals that do so, as sufficient to reduce medical
errors. Three of four respondents supported mandatory reporting
of medical errors; 60 percent say reported errors should
be publicly disclosed.
Seventy-three
percent of respondents backed the notion of fostering the
formation of integrated delivery systems or “virtual integration” by
information technology and/or new payment systems.
The
respondents include health care delivery, finance and policy
experts and government officials. A full story on the survey’s
findings will appear in the July 30 edition of Modern Healthcare magazine.
Back
to top
|
Rankings
And Report Cards
This
column was originally published in AMA
eVoice on July
26, 2007. Dr. Davis is president of the American
Medical Association and a WCMSSM member.
Readers
love rankings and report cards. Every week seems to bring
us another list of the best or worst of whatever.
Michael
Moore's new movie Sicko highlighted the World Health
Organization's ranking of the best
health care systems in the world. In my
review of the movie in an earlier column, I
cited a few compelling critiques of the WHO's ranking scheme.
Click
on the link below for the full column:
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/17873.html
Back
to top
|
Dem
Pres Candidates Espouse Universal Coverage
Democratic presidential candidates former Sen. John
Edwards (N.C.), Sens. Barack
Obama (Ill.) and Hillary
Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), and Rep. Dennis
Kucinich (Ohio) on Friday at an annual conference
sponsored by the National
Urban League said that they support universal health
insurance for children, Long
Island Newsday reports
(Evans, Long Island Newsday,
7/28).
At the conference, Edwards said that he supports a universal health
insurance system for all U.S. residents, adding that he would make
changes to the health insurance and pharmaceutical industries. "The
system is rigged, it's broken," Edwards said, adding, "We
will never create one America until we fix the system" (Mannies, St.
Louis Post-Dispatch, 7/28).
Obama praised the Harlem Children's Zone, a coalition of 15 community
centers in upper Manhattan that provides health care, nutrition and
other services to at-risk children (Long Island Newsday,
7/28).
Kucinich said that the United States could have used the $1 trillion
spent on the war in Iraq to fund a universal health insurance system.
He added, "The money is there. The question is whether the will
is there" (St. Louis
Post-Dispatch, 7/28). National Urban League President
Marc Morial said that, although the group invited Republican presidential
candidates to the conference, none attended (Long Island Newsday,
7/28).
Health
Care Professionals Contribute More to Democrats
Democratic candidates for the first time in more than 10 years have
received more campaign contributions from health care professionals
than Republican candidates, the AP/Wichita
Eagle reports. According to the AP/Eagle, the shift has resulted because "Democrats
now control Congress and Democratic presidential candidates are raising
more money than are Republicans."
Jonathan Oberlander, a health care politics expert at University
of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, said, "The health care industry
wants to influence the majority in Congress, and ... they are reading
the same tea leaves as everyone else that suggest the Democrats could
have good results in the 2008 elections" (Kuhnhenn, AP/Wichita
Eagle, 7/29).
Letter
Asks What Edwards Really Mean
What
in the world is John
Edwards saying? “New ‘healthcare markets’ would give
families and businesses purchasing power and a choice of
quality plans, including one public plan.”
Is he proposing “one public plan” or “a choice of quality plans”?
Then he says, “businesses would either cover their employees or help
pay their premiums.” I guess this means a new law requiring businesses
to pay. Or, do businesses only have to “help to pay”?
http://www.modernhealthcare.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070727/FREE/307270003/1025/FREE
Back
to top
|
Children's
Health Bill Could Undermine JCAHO
The
Joint Commission would lose its deeming authority under
a legislative proposal reauthorizing the State Children’s
Health Insurance Program and revising other provisions
in Medicare and Medicaid. If this bill is passed, a hospital
accredited by the commission would no longer automatically
meet conditions of participation under Medicare.
"The
Joint Commission is aware of that provision (in the bill),
and we'll be working with the folks on Capitol Hill," a
commission spokeswoman told Modern Healthcare.
This
and other controversial provisions are part of the Children’s
Health and Medicare Protection Act, which was being worked
on by the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The bill
was approved by the House Ways and Means Committee early
Friday, although partisan debate has stalled progress in
the Energy and Commerce Committee, with much of the arguments
centering on funding and on the bill’s proposals to expand
coverage to older children and immigrants under waiver
options.
The
bill has received mixed reviews from health care providers:
the American Hospital Association recently showed support
for the bill’s Medicare provisions in letters to the leadership
on Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means. Other groups,
such as the Physician Hospitals of America oppose the bill’s
permanent ban on physician self-referral to specialty hospitals.
Its provisions to freeze reimbursement rate increases to
some providers could slash nursing home care by $2.7 billion
over five years, the American Health Care Association estimates.
Despite
the deadlock in the House, sources on the Hill are expecting
that both SCHIP reauthorization bills in the House and
Senate will be ready this week—with a Senate vote taking
place as early as today or tomorrow.
Back
to top
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|

This publication brought to you by Natinsky
Publishing Network.
Problems seeing this email? You may view it online at http://www.wcmssm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter contact info@wcmssm.org
|
|
Wayne County Medical Society
of Southeast Michigan.
All Rights Reserved.
|