|
July 30, 2007 |
|
IN THIS ISSUE
Editor's Column: Will The Truth Set Us Free?
WSU,
Oakwood Bolster Partnership With Agreement
DMC Named In
Most Wired Hospitals Survey
Poll Positions IT As Key To
Health Care Quality, Efficiency
Rankings And Report Cards
Dem Pres
Candidates Espouse Universal Coverage
Children's Health Bill Could Undermine JCAHO |
|
Click Here To Contact Us

|
|
Editor's Column: Will The Truth Set Us Free?
By JOSEPH WEISS, MD
In the Saturday July 14, New York Times, on a front page article,
the public read that oncologists were withholding potentially
lifesaving anti-cancer drugs, Bexxar and Zevalin. According to the
Times article, the reason is that the drugs don’t provide physicians
enough profit.
The growing public outrage that has the potential to shackle
the medical community is more dangerous to us than confinement to a
prison cell. The heat of public response threatens to warp our
integrity and bring congressional rebuke in the form of legislative
controls on our prescribing activities.
We need the AMA to rise to our defense. My discussions with
oncology colleagues leads me to question whether the problem with
Bexxar and Zevalin resides not with physician profit but in
governmental policies including unreasonable documentation and
uncertain reimbursement. Only the AMA has the resources to assess
the real role of the oncologists.
Furthermore, the present controversy over cancer care should
set in motion a long term AMA response. We need our foremost
organization to act with speed and justice now ; uncover for us
the truth that will set us free.
Turmoil in
medical care will only continue. We can count on facing future
accusations creating unwarranted public upset and inappropriate
government response. The oncology experience can serve us. The AMA
should use the episode to initiate a long-term policy to safeguard
our independence and defend our reputations.
Back to top
|
|
WSU, Oakwood Bolster Partnership With
Agreement
Oakwood Healthcare,
Inc. and Wayne State University announced an agreement late last
week in which a total of 41 WSU physicians and residents
specializing in otolaryngology, urology and dermatology have joined
Oakwood Hospital & Medical Center’s specialists who are currently
providing exceptional care. In addition, the WSU residents and
physicians now have access to Oakwood’s facilities and technology.
“Wayne State University is one of the premier academic medical
schools in the country, and we are excited to partner with them in
providing a first-rate medical education to the 41 new residents
joining our ranks,” said Brian Connolly, president and CEO, OHI.
“Oakwood is proud of its long history of service, and with this new
partnership, we will be able to offer these exceptionally talented
health care professionals a high-quality place to practice medicine,
while simultaneously providing the communities we serve greater
access to excellent health care.”
The agreement will
include undergraduate and graduate medical education and basic,
clinical and community-based research and further the goal of both
institutions to become an academic health center of national renown.
“This enhanced
relationship with Oakwood provides us with a partner that can
collaborate with us on all three components of our mission –
education, research and patient care,” said Robert M. Mentzer Jr.,
MD, dean of the Wayne State University School of Medicine. “As the
School of Medicine develops its strategic plan for its future as a
regional health care partner, relationships like this will be vital
to our future.”
In June of 2006,
OHI and WSU signed an affiliation agreement to create an academic
and clinical care partnership. This latest collaboration is another
example of efforts to create a long-term partnership between both
institutions that will result over time in the creation of programs
that support enhanced medical education, research and clinical care.
Kerith Spicknall,
MD, is a WSU resident in Dermatology. Spicknall, 31, has been with
Oakwood since September 2006, and is pleased to have access to
expert staff, an exceptional surgical clinic and new laser
technology; however, the location is also a welcoming factor.
“I live in Detroit,
so I wasn’t really interested in being shifted to a hospital that’s
further in the suburbs. I like Dearborn, I like where Oakwood is
located,” said Spicknall. “I think it’s very convenient, but at the
same time, it offers a whole subset of new patients in a
state-of-the-art and inviting atmosphere.”
With the increase
in medical staffing, OHMC will be able to reduce the time it takes
Oakwood patients to see a physician, which will result in better
patient outcomes and improved patient satisfaction. Additionally,
new technology allows residents to explore many new and exciting
aspects of their careers in medicine.
“Having access to
high-tech equipment is good for the residency training program
because we’ll be using these new innovations once we get out into
the new world and practice on our own,” said fifth-year
Otolaryngology Chief Resident, Giancarlo Zuliani, MD. “It’s really
advantageous for us to get experience with the technologies because
patients will want the newest and greatest and, as a physician, you
want to be able to provide those services.”
For more
information on Oakwood or WSU, visit
www.oakwood.org
and
www.wayne.edu.
Back
to top
|
|
DMC Named In Most Wired Hospital Survey
The Detroit Medical Center has been named in the list of Most Wired
Hospitals and Health Systems according to the results of the 2007
Most Wired Survey and Benchmarking Study released July 17 in the
July issue of Hospitals & Health Networks magazine.
The Most Wired Survey is conducted annually by Hospitals & Health
Networks magazine, which uses the results to name the 100 Most Wired
hospitals and health systems. The nation’s 100 Most Wired hospitals
show better outcomes in four key areas: mortality rates, patient
safety measures from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ), core measures from Hospital Compare and average length of
stay. The survey focuses on how the nation’s hospitals use
information technologies for quality, customer service, public
health and safety, business processes and workforce issues. (The
July H&HN cover story detailing results is available at
www.hhnmag.com.)
"The continued adoption of technology for clinical systems in health
care is driving rapid change and great outcomes,” said Lewis Redd,
managing partner, Accenture Health & Life Sciences North American
Provider Practice and one of the 2007 Survey sponsors. “The leaders
in the field are already showing us how technology can help connect
hospitals with their patients and enhance clinical outcomes. This
survey is a call to action.”
Back to
top
|
|
Poll Positions IT As Key To Health Care Quality,
Efficiency
A survey of health care leaders has found that when it comes to
improving health care quality, information technology is the most
important solution.
The latest Commonwealth Fund/Modern Healthcare Opinion
Leaders Survey found that 66 percent of 214 policy leaders believe
that rapid adoption of electronic health records and other IT
systems is job No. 1 for solving the problem of widespread
inefficiency and uneven quality of care. That was followed by public
reporting of provider performance on quality measures (59 percent)
and financial incentives for improved quality of care, such as
pay-for-performance programs (51 percent). Respondents were allowed
to choose more than one solution.
Seventy percent of survey respondents say the federal government
should play a leading role in backing providers’ IT investments.
Another 58 percent say health plans and insurers have a
responsibility to support expansion.
Only 7 percent described the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement
Act of 2005, which allows providers to voluntarily report medical
errors and ensures the confidentiality of physicians and hospitals
that do so, as sufficient to reduce medical errors. Three of four
respondents supported mandatory reporting of medical errors; 60
percent say reported errors should be publicly disclosed.
Seventy-three percent of respondents backed the notion of fostering
the formation of integrated delivery systems or “virtual
integration” by information technology and/or new payment systems.
The respondents include health care delivery, finance and policy
experts and government officials. A full story on the survey’s
findings will appear in the July 30 edition of Modern Healthcare
magazine.
Back to
top |
Rankings And Report Cards
This
column was originally published in
AMA eVoice on
July 26, 2007. Dr. Davis
is president of the American Medical Association and a WCMSSM
member.
Readers
love rankings and report cards. Every week seems to bring us another
list of the best or worst of whatever.
Michael
Moore's new movie Sicko highlighted the World Health
Organization's ranking of the
best health care systems in the world.
In
my review of the movie in
an earlier column, I cited a few compelling critiques of the WHO's
ranking scheme.
Click on the link
below for the full column:
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/17873.html
Back to
top
|
Dem Pres Candidates Espouse Universal Coverage
Democratic presidential candidates former Sen.
John Edwards (N.C.), Sens.
Barack Obama (Ill.) and
Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), and Rep.
Dennis Kucinich (Ohio) on Friday at an annual conference
sponsored by the
National Urban League said that they support universal health
insurance for children,
Long Island Newsday
reports (Evans, Long Island
Newsday, 7/28).
At the conference, Edwards said that he supports a universal health
insurance system for all U.S. residents, adding that he would make
changes to the health insurance and pharmaceutical industries. "The
system is rigged, it's broken," Edwards said, adding, "We will never
create one America until we fix the system" (Mannies,
St. Louis Post-Dispatch,
7/28).
Obama praised the Harlem Children's Zone, a coalition of 15
community centers in upper Manhattan that provides health care,
nutrition and other services to at-risk children (Long Island
Newsday, 7/28).
Kucinich said that the United States could have used the $1 trillion
spent on the war in Iraq to fund a universal health insurance
system. He added, "The money is there. The question is whether the
will is there" (St. Louis
Post-Dispatch, 7/28). National Urban League President
Marc Morial said that, although the group invited Republican
presidential candidates to the conference, none attended (Long
Island Newsday,
7/28).
Health Care Professionals Contribute More to Democrats
Democratic candidates for the first time in more than 10 years have
received more campaign contributions from health care professionals
than Republican candidates, the
AP/Wichita Eagle
reports. According to the AP/Eagle, the shift has resulted because "Democrats now
control Congress and Democratic presidential candidates are raising
more money than are Republicans."
Jonathan Oberlander, a health care politics expert at
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, said, "The health care
industry wants to influence the majority in Congress, and ... they
are reading the same tea leaves as everyone else that suggest the
Democrats could have good results in the 2008 elections" (Kuhnhenn,
AP/Wichita Eagle,
7/29).
Letter Asks What
Edwards Really Mean
What in the world is
John Edwards saying? “New ‘healthcare markets’ would give
families and businesses purchasing power and a choice of quality
plans, including one public plan.”
Is he proposing “one public plan” or “a choice of quality plans”?
Then he says, “businesses would either cover their employees or help
pay their premiums.” I guess this means a new law requiring
businesses to pay. Or, do businesses only have to “help to pay”?
http://www.modernhealthcare.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070727/FREE/307270003/1025/FREE
Back to
top |
Children's
Health Bill Could Undermine JCAHO
The Joint Commission would lose its deeming authority under a
legislative proposal reauthorizing the State Children’s Health
Insurance Program and revising other provisions in Medicare and
Medicaid. If this bill is passed, a hospital accredited by the
commission would no longer automatically meet conditions of
participation under Medicare.
"The Joint Commission is aware of that provision (in the bill), and
we'll be working with the folks on Capitol Hill," a commission
spokeswoman told Modern Healthcare.
This and other controversial provisions are part of the Children’s
Health and Medicare Protection Act, which was being worked on by the
House Energy and Commerce Committee. The bill was approved by the
House Ways and Means Committee early Friday, although partisan
debate has stalled progress in the Energy and Commerce Committee,
with much of the arguments centering on funding and on the bill’s
proposals to expand coverage to older children and immigrants under
waiver options.
The bill has received mixed reviews from health care providers: the
American Hospital Association recently showed support for the bill’s
Medicare provisions in letters to the leadership on Energy and
Commerce and Ways and Means. Other groups, such as the Physician
Hospitals of America oppose the bill’s permanent ban on physician
self-referral to specialty hospitals. Its provisions to freeze
reimbursement rate increases to some providers could slash nursing
home care by $2.7 billion over five years, the American Health Care
Association estimates.
Despite the deadlock in the House, sources on the Hill are expecting
that both SCHIP reauthorization bills in the House and Senate will
be ready this week—with a Senate vote taking place as early as today
or tomorrow.
Back to
top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

This publication brought to you by Natinsky
Publishing Network.
Problems seeing this email? You may view it online at http://www.wcmssm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter contact
info@wcmssm.org |
|