|
April 13, 2009 |
|
IN THIS ISSUE
Editor's Column: Three Comments On Medical Matters
In My Opinion: The New York Times Concept Of
Health Insurance
House Snuffs Smoking Ban
AMA To Cut 100 Positions
St. John Announces Plans For Near East Side Hub
Health Authority Offers Easy Internet Medicaid
Enrollment
WSUSOM Researchers To Benefit From Small Animal
MRI
DMC Brings Greenway Into
Health IT Fold |
|
Click Here To Contact Us
|
Editor's Column: Three Comments On
Medical Matters
By JOSEPH
WEISS, MD
HEALTH PLANS FOR
ALL – EXCEPT US
If all Americans are to receive health insurance coverage, who will
be the insurer? Will private insurers take the responsibility or
will the government expand Medicare and eventually take in everyone?
For physicians,
it doesn’t matter who wins. In either case, we lose.
If private
insurers carry the day, they will determine our reimbursements in
the manner they do now: that is, paying us roughly the Medicare
rate. If government insurance becomes the way of health care
coverage, we will see the prevailing Medicare reimbursement schedule
carried over into the expanded government plan.
Leave it to
ethicists, planners and health care economists to debate the merits
of private vs. public coverage. The energy and brains of the medical
community should focus on developing a suitable replacement for the
Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula. Whether we labor under a
predominantly private or public system, that replacement, if not
coming from us, will come from Congress and will govern our pay for
the foreseeable future.
HEALTH PLANS OF
THE FUTURE
The American College of Physicians has its document: The Future of
Health Care in the United States. The American College of
Rheumatologists has its document with the same title. Both
organizations speak in a solemn tone, as if each were the first to
conceive that health care should include coverage for all Americans,
should be high quality and that cost should be low enough for the
nation to afford.
Neither the
internists nor the rheumatologists offer any suggestions on how the
government is to devise a medical care system that provides access
to all, is unwavering in its excellence and is cheap to run. The
internists and rheumatologists take the stance that now that they
have told the government what they want, it is the Congress’ job to
figure out how to do it.
Do we dare leave
it to Congress?
CONTENT TO HANG
SEPARATELY
I have been to Capitol Hill and lobbied for the internists and then
the next month lobbied for the rheumatologists. I can say from that
experience that when the internists go to Congress they ask for more
money as if no other medical group exists, has needs or deserves
attention. When the rheumatologists go to Capitol Hill the same
attitude prevails. Neither specialty acknowledges that any other
group of physicians sees itself as needing or deserving attention.
The American
College of Physicians proclaims a crisis in primary care that
requires billions of dollars from Congress in higher reimbursements
for Internists, subsidized residencies in internal medicine and loan
forgiveness for internal medicine residents as incentives to enter
the field.
The American
College of Rheumatology says that a dire shortage of pediatric
rheumatologists exists. The solution is government money to fund the
training of a small army of these subspecialists. The rheumatology
position paper then lists the needs of rheumatology research and
urges Congress to pour billions of dollars into that area.
The oncologists
and general surgeons follow with similar prepared talks on the
crisis coming to their specialties. Claiming that Congress has not
given us what we want only perpetuates the problems of receiving
neither attention nor money. If we want subsidies for our residents
and funds for our researchers, we must present Congress with a plan
on parceling funds that comes from agreement and negotiation among
ourselves.
It is as
imperative that we change our present ways as it is for the auto
industry to restructure or redesign its cars.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
In My Opinion: The New
York Times Opinion Of Health Insurance
By SUSAN
ADELMAN, MD
In an April 7 editorial, the New York Times supports a new public
plan health insurance option that will compete with private plans.
Arguments given include: “to offer consumers greater choice, keep
the private plans honest and, one can hope, restrain the relentless
growth in health care premiums and underlying medical costs”
Looking at the
history of large-scale Medicaid fraud in California and remembering
a recent attempt by the Illinois governor to shake down a children’s
hospital, why does the editorialist believe a public system would be
more honest than a private one? At least a private plan has an
incentive to minimize abuses that reduce profitability and
efficiency. Yes, there may be incentives to be less honest in order
to increase profits, but studies of private hospitals fail to
document this. When I was on the Council, the AMA Council on Medical
Service started a report that we expected would take private
hospitals to task for milking the system to pump up profits, as
compared with public hospitals, but the data did not support our
assumption.
“A public plan
might do a better job of slowing the growth of health care costs,
although Medicare has not been notably successful in that regard,”
states the editorial. Well, yes. Neither Medicare nor Medicaid has
been particularly successful in controlling costs. They have not
lowered administrative costs by eliminating private plans either.
They have subcontracted all or part of their programs to private
plans and HMOs.
“And it could
probably force doctors and hospitals to accept lower reimbursements
than they negotiate with private insurers, allowing the public plan
to charge lower premiums and attract more customers,” the editorial
continues. So the NYT acknowledges that the public plan would drain
away patients from the private plans. The end point for private
plans will come when they become unprofitable. Then the
government-run system will be the only game in town, except for
wealthy patients who can pay for an expensive alternative.
A major media
outlet has interviewed the staff of certain hospitals which
discontinued outpatient oncology services because of a financial
shortfall. This is apparently presented as an argument for a new
public health care system which would presumably never do such a
thing. In fact, this is exactly the sort of rationing a public
system would be most likely to do when it is strapped for funds. You
see this in England today, where access to dialysis and kidney
transplantation is rationed by age. In the Canadian system too, a
famous actress just died because the hospital lacked neurosurgical
services in the locality where she fell during a ski lesson.
Yes, we need
multiple health care reforms, but we must be careful what we ask
for. We may get it.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
House Snuffs
Smoking Ban
Health and clean
air advocates will have to wait a few more months, at least, until
Michigan again takes a run at joining the majority of states that
don’t allow smoking in workplaces, including bars and restaurants.
Legislators of
both parties have put the smoking issue on the back burner to spend
more time with the state budget and issues created by dour economic
conditions.
House Speaker
Andy Dillon told the Detroit News he “sees(s) us getting back to the
smoking issue by summer.”
The House and
Senate have passed different versions of the smoking ban. The Senate
approved a total ban and the House a ban that permits smoking in
casinos and cigar bars.
Revenues for the
next fiscal year, beginning Oct. 1, are projected to fall short by
about $100 million a month.
Share Your Thoughts on this
Article
Back to top
|
AMA To Cut 100
Positions
Citing the need
to reduce its operating budget “to offset declining revenues,” the
American Medical Association announced this afternoon that it would
eliminate 100 selected open and existing staff positions from its
1,200-employee staff with layoffs occurring at both its Chicago and
Washington offices. The cuts amount to 8.3 percent of its staff.
The staff
reductions go in effect May 4.
“This is a
tremendously difficult decision for the AMA,” said AMA Executive
Vice President and Chief Executive Officer Michael Maves, MD, in a
news release. “By taking these steps now, we will be in a position
to continue our important work without compromising our future
financial health. Appropriately aligning our revenues and expenses
provides us with an opportunity to sharpen our focus and ensure we
have the financial resources to get the job done.”
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
St. John Announces Plans For Near
East Side Hub
Primary services
will remain vital at the Detroit Riverview site on East Jefferson,
according to Bob Hoban, Senior Strategy Officer, St. John Health. As
the health system looks to sell the hospital complex, he envisions
that private primary care physician practices and the Health Centers
Detroit Federally Qualified Health Center look-alike will remain in
the professional building on the campus. Eventually, he would like
to add diagnostic services in the hospital building to serve that
site and other primary care facilities on the Near East Side.
St. John Health
is supportive of the collaborative process under way through the
Near East Side initiative, Hoban said. "As I look long-term, this
will have to be one of the hubs for the East Side. We're going to
look collaboratively where the links should be established." He
noted that the Gratiot corridor and Connor Creek, a former St. John
campus, offer potential sites for additional hubs. He would also
like to see another FQHC site added to the East Side.
The Health
Authority's Near East Side initiative calls for a "hub and spoke"
model of primary care delivery in which several primary care
facilities surround a hub - in this case the Riverview campus - and
use its diagnostic services for their patients.
Hoban explained
that the health system intends to enhance its relationship with the
Oakland University nursing program, which has recently established a
presence at the site. The program graduates 100 nurses annually.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back to top
|
Health Authority
Offers Easy Internet Medicaid Enrollment
The Detroit Wayne
County Health Authority has begun using a web-based Medicaid
enrollment service that will expedite the screening and enrollment
of prospective Medicaid recipients. The new technology, called
HelpEngen™, was developed by TriHealix, a health care technology
firm based in Norwalk, CT.
HelpEngen enables
health care providers to connect uninsured patients to the right
assistance program by facilitating the collection of patient
information, providing an immediate assessment of whether the
application might be approved for benefits, and generating all the
appropriate application forms for potentially eligible patients.
Help Engen will be used by the Health Authority and will also be
made available to health systems that it contracts with for Medicaid
outreach.
"This is a major
step forward in our drive to ensure that everyone who qualifies for
health benefits is enrolled," according to Chris Allen, CEO of the
Detroit Wayne County Health Authority. "This tool not only provides
a much more expedient enrollment process, but it indicates who is
likely not to qualify for benefits. We can then find alternate
resources to meet their needs."
"For health
systems, this tool also means greatly expanded capability to manage
the growing financial burden of caring for their uninsured patients.
So it represents a true win-win for both patients and providers. We
believe that HelpEngen will become a national model for improving
access to health care through the enrollment process."
The HelpEngen
platform supports best practices in patient access and revenue cycle
management, by allowing providers to:
-
Accurately
classify uninsured patients at the point of care to distinguish
those who are eligible for government-sponsored health coverage
or provider charity care, from those who are truly self-pay;
-
Enroll
eligible patients in the most appropriate program or programs,
and then track the status of those patients;
-
Easily share
information across departments or facilities;
-
Comply with
charity care policies/regulations by capturing and reporting
metrics on the delivery of charity care and community benefit.
HelpEngen, like
computer-based tax software, offers an outreach worker a cleanly
designed online interview that can be filled out within 30 minutes.
HelpEngen then tests information collected in the interview against
requirements for Medicaid and other public programs and returns a
real-time detailed assessment of likely eligibility organized by
program type with full program description, benefit level, and the
reason why the patient is or is not eligible. At that point, the
outreach worker can generate completed official application forms
which can be printed for signature then saved electronically.
Initially, the
forms will be mailed to the state Medicaid office. Eventually,
however, the Health Authority hopes to establish an online link to
the department,offering direct transmission of forms. Key
information captured in the electronic interview includes
demographics, insurance status, and health care use patterns, as
well as all information required to determine eligibility and apply
for public health coverage programs, hospital charity care programs,
and uninsured patient discount programs.
While the
technology has the capacity to calculate potential eligibility for
any means-tested program, the Michigan Department of Human Services
(DHS) will continue to make the actual eligibility determination.
This tool will make the job easier. The Health Authority plans to
work with DHS and the Michigan Department of Community Health to
electronically submit the applications directly to local offices for
determination of eligibility and enrollment. This technology will
allow the Health Authority to begin to identify and assess the truly
uninsured and develop the appropriate safety net measures necessary
to ensure access to quality care.
"Outreach workers
will find this a very helpful tool in conducting their client
interviews," explains Faith Polk, Medical Program Administrator for
the Health Authority. "It will give people so much more information
about eligibility." There are several categories of Medicaid
eligibility. It's difficult for anyone to understand and reference
all of them during a client interview, she adds.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
WSUSOM Researchers
To Benefit From Small Animal MRI
The 7T ClinScan
MRI was installed March 31 in the Elliman Clinical Research Building
on the School of Medicine campus. Bruce Berkowitz, PhD, professor
and director of the Small Animal MRI Facility, estimated it would be
about three months before research can be conducted on the new
machine regularly.
The $2 million
scanner will be one of the first of its kind with the new Siemens
interface, said Mark Haacke, PhD, director of the MR Research
Facility and a professor of Radiology. Both Dr. Haacke and Dr.
Berkowitz are responsible for the successful shared instrumentation
grant that brought this piece of equipment to Wayne State
University.
“There are only
four or five machines in the world like this. This machine comes
with Siemens software and interface,” said Dr. Haacke. “Wayne State
University has collaborated with Siemens for a long time, and we
have a long history and excellent reputation for development of new
technology and new uses in this field.”
The new 7T, Dr.
Haacke said, should have researchers across the Wayne State
University campus champing at the bit to schedule time at the MR
Research Facility.
“This gives us
much more capability and flexibility,” he said. “We have a lot of
people using the 4.7T now, and we can switch some of them over to
the 7T for higher resolution and better sequencing.”
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
DMC Brings Greenway
Into Health IT Fold
Greenway Medical
Technologies, a leading provider of an integrated electronic health
record (EHR), practice management and interoperability solution,
recently announced a strategic deal with Detroit Medical Center (DMC)
in which physicians and care providers within the nine-hospital
network will have access to Greenway’s flagship EHR solution,
PrimeSuite®, along with other solutions in Greenway’s complete
integrated physician’s infrastructure, reported Greenway.
DMC is expanding
its portfolio of healthcare information technology (HIT) tools that
DMC physicians can use while treating patients by adding Greenway®
as a preferred solution to streamline clinical, financial and
administrative workflows of the center’s affiliated physicians and
medical practices. DMC physicians, staff and other care providers
selected Greenway as a preferred solution and as a part of this new
relationship, DMC will be donating a percentage of the qualifying
EHR technology to its affiliated physicians and medical practices
under the recently modified Stark exceptions and anti-kickback safe
harbors for donation of health information technology.
The partnership
with DMC highlights Greenway’s continued growth as healthcare
providers begin utilizing government HIT and EHR adoption incentives
to install health IT solutions that improve care, provide increased
return on investment and help establish an interoperable health care
system. These incentives (include/will soon include) financial
reimbursement offered through the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act (ARRA) and the Physicians Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI).
"By offering
Greenway’s solutions to care providers within our network, we add
yet another tool to help eliminate medical errors and improve
information exchange with our physicians," said Dr. Leland Babitch,
chief medical information officer at the DMC. "Our goal is to offer
a well-rounded array of tools that improve and enhance the ability
of our physicians and staff to provide the highest level of patient
care throughout our system and the community."
Greenway Medical
Technologies provides the latest in ambulatory health care business
solutions and services to more than 24,000 healthcare providers and
professionals nationwide, in 30 specialties and subspecialties, by
enhancing the delivery of patient care through innovative HIT
software. Established in 1998, Carrollton, Ga.-based Greenway
Medical Technologies is a privately held company with approximately
300 employees. For more information about Greenway, visit
www.greenwaymedical.com
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
|

This publication brought to you by
Natinsky Publishing Network.
Problems seeing this email? You may view it online at
http://www.wcmssm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter contact
info@wcmssm.org |
|