|
February 16,
2009
|
|
IN
THIS ISSUE
Editor's Column:
Pharmaceutical Influence: To Be Or Not To Be?
In My Opinion: Real Change
WSUSOM, DMC Break Payment Logjam
Governor Urges Legislators To Push
Smoking Ban...Again
Immunization Not Harmful To Infants,
Says IOM, Court
St. John Hospital Names Pediatric Surgery
Chief
Dr. Kleerekoper Wins Endocrinology
Award
This Week's Sign Of The
Apocalypse: Smokers Quit For Pets' Sake
|
|
Click
Here To Contact Us
|
Editor's
Column: Pharmaceutical Influence: To Be Or Not To Be?
By
JOSEPH WEISS, MD
In the first article in the New England Journal of Medicine of Feb
5th, Dr. Robert Steinbrook reviews the revised code of
ethics of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
(PhRMA). He notes that the new code states that members of the Association,
which includes every drug manufacturer in America, will no longer
provide coffee mugs, pens, notepaper, stethoscopes, lunches, gifts,
tickets or entertainment to physicians or physicians in training.
Dr. Steinbrook goes on to describe other limits on PhRMA
contacts with physicians and concludes by predicting the
change in gift giving will just shift the approach to marketing
the medical community.
He had only to go to the last article in the same Feb 5th issue
of the New England Journal of Medicine to learn he was
correct. The article, Limits On Medicare’s Ability to
Control Rising Spending on Cancer Drugs, by P.B. Bach,
details how legislation passed by Congress allows oncologists
to use non- FDA-approved drugs for which Medicare must
pay the market price. The legislation allows oncologists,
but no other physicians, to purchase non-FDA approved anti-cancer
drugs at discounted prices, but forbids Medicare to apply
policies in place that lead to least costly payments in
reimbursing oncologists who use these medications. Thus
the effect of these laws and regulation are to allow oncologists
a good profit on their cancer drug investment.
Such specific and detailed law and regulations mandating
coverage of anti-cancer chemotherapeutic regimens necessitated
the coordinated efforts of the pharmaceutical industry
and the American Society of Clinical Oncologists. The lobbying
likely required years of advocacy and possibly millions
of dollars.
If such pharmacy-specialty physician coalitions become profitable
enough for the drug companies, we may see new biological
drugs not made to bind to cell receptors, but created to
fit both the contours of the law and the specialty physician’s
balance sheet.
The medical community can expect to see increasing growth
of the “pharmaceutical-medical complex.” These marketing
ventures will influence physician buying habits in ways
the pen-and-lunch gift givers never dreamed possible. Eventually
another round of prohibitions will stop such raids on the
health care purse but in the meantime, family physicians,
internists, general surgeons, and obstetricians/gynecologists
will fall further behind in their efforts for financial
equality. At the same time, the public will find that the
rhetoric for cost containment will turn deafening as the
cost of health care soars as never before.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
In
My Opinion: Real Change
By
ALLAN DOBZYNIAK, MD
Government controlled universal health care will define the end of
capitalism. This will allow government to tax without restraint since
it can always be ascribed to maintaining your access to the precious
entity of personal health care.
The
2.4 trillion dollar health care industry is greater than
the GDP of France. Government will be in control of the
largest segment of the United States economy. Remember
what the Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman
said, controlling both politics and the economy is the
road to tyranny.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
WSUSOM,
DMC Break Payment Logjam
According
to published reports last week, Wayne State University
and Detroit Medical Center, after negotiating for over
a year, have agreed on a revised contract that resolves
a $12.3 million physician payment dispute.
The
new contract, which is not regarded as a settlement, requires
the university to provide additional services, which include
physician recruitment, to DMC after which it will receive
the disputed funds over time, said Mary Zuckerman, DMC’s
chief of business operations, reported Crain’s Detroit
Business.
Under
an agreement brokered by a state-appointed mediator in
2006, DMC was supposed to pay WSU $1.6 million per month
for Medicaid and specified other services. However, on
Feb. 1, 2008, DMC notified the university that it was going
to hold $12 million in payments because it regarded the
money as double payment for services that were already
reimbursed directly by the Medicaid program.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
Governor
Urges Legislature To Push Smoking Ban...Again
During
her State of the State address, Gov. Jennifer Granholm,
once again, strongly urged Michigan lawmakers to pass comprehensive
smokefree workplace legislation.
“We
again applaud the governor’s comments tonight and her support
for smokefree air,” said Susan Schechter, CSA spokesperson
and director of advocacy at the American Lung Association
of Michigan. “Many lawmakers have done their research and
know that in 2006 US Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona
released a report stating the only way to protect Americans
from secondhand smoke is through comprehensive smoke-free
workplace legislation and policies. It’s time for lawmakers
to stop dancing around the issue and finally listen to
the state’s leader as well as their constituents and pass
comprehensive smoke-free air legislation this year.”
With
a new term beginning, there has been a groundswell of support
from lawmakers, evident by the four bills that have been
introduced thus far from both chambers. In addition to
the bills, a Smokefree Air Caucus, led by long-time smoke-free
air supporter Sen. Ray Basham (D-Taylor), Rep. Joan Bauer
(D-Lansing), Sen. Roger Kahn (R-Saginaw Twp.) and Rep.
Paul Scott (R-Grand Blanc) is being developed within the
legislature. The caucus will be bicameral and bipartisan
and will ask lawmakers to sign a pledge to work on smoke-free
air legislation.
The governor once again made a call to action on smoke-free
legislation during her annual speech. The governor also
called for lawmakers to act in 2007. For more information
about the Campaign for Smokefree Air, please visit www.MakeMIAirSmokefree.org.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
Immunization
Not Shown To Be Harmful To Infants, Says IOM, Courts
Although
most people realize the benefits of vaccinations, a recent
survey showed that approximately one-quarter of parents
believe that infants get more vaccines than are good for
them, and that too many immunizations could overwhelm an
infant's immune system.
On
Feb. 20, 2002, the Institue of Medicine (IOM) released
its latest report in a series on vaccine safety, "Immunization
Safety Review: Multiple Immunizations and Immune Dysfunction."
The IOM's
Immunization Safety Committee reviewed eight
studies of the relationship between multiple vaccinations
and Type 1 diabetes, the autoimmune form of the disease.
All eight studies consistently demonstrated that multiple
immunizations had no effect on the incidence of Type
1 diabetes, leading the committee to reject the notion
that multiple vaccinations cause an increased risk
of the disease.
The
IOM also looked at the results of seven studies, which,
despite some variations and limitations, consistently showed
that multiple vaccinations either had no effect on the
risk of infection or provided some degree of protection
against infection. The IOM concluded that multiple immunizations
do not increase the risk of young children developing various
infections, ranging from colds and ear infections to pneumonia
and meningitis.
The
IOM also examined five studies looking at multiple vaccinations
and their potential to cause allergic diseases, which reflect
a hypersensitivity of the immune system to relatively harmless
agents in the environment, like pollens, dust mites, insect
venom, and specific foods. Some, but not all, of these
studies suggested that certain vaccines increase the risk
of developing allergic disorders. However, methodological
weaknesses and inconsistent findings among the studies,
led the committee to conclude that there is inadequate
evidence to either accept or reject a causal relationship
between multiple immunizations and increased risk of allergic
diseases, particularly asthma.
Finally,
the IOM recommended that the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services convene an expert panel to examine parents'
perceptions of vaccine risks and benefits in order to develop
better communication tools for them and their doctors.
The
IOM Immunization Safety Review Committee's most important
conclusions were:
1. A
review of the available scientific evidence does not support
the hypothesis that the infant immune system is inherently
incapable of handling the number of antigens that children
are exposed to during routine immunizations,
2. The
epidemiologic evidence (i.e., from studies of vaccine-exposed
populations and their control groups) favors rejection
of a causal relationship between multiple immunizations
and increased risk for infections or for type 1 diabetes
mellitus,
3. The
epidemiologic evidence regarding increased risk for allergic
disease, particularly asthma, was inadequate to accept
or reject a causal relationship.
The
US Supreme Court also weighed in on the issue, prompting
AMA Board Chairman Joseph Heyman, MD, to comment: “Three
recent rulings by the Special Masters of the U.S. Court
of Federal Claims provides even more overwhelming evidence
that there is no association between vaccines and autism
or related disorders. Vaccines are one of the best public
health accomplishments of all time and have proven time
and time again their ability to keep horrific diseases
at bay. Measles, rubella, and polio are among the success
stories of diseases eliminated in the United States, but
are still active in other countries and could rebound here.
“Autism
is a heart-wrenching condition, and the upheaval felt by
parents whose children suffer with autism is understandable – as
is their search for answers. We need ongoing research into
the causes of autism, but cannot let unfounded myths keep
us from giving our children the proven protection they
need against infectious diseases.”
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
St.
John Hospital Names Pediatric Surgery Chief
Marc
L. Cullen, MD, has been named division chief of Pediatric
Surgery at St. John Hospital and Medical Center. He comes
to SJH&MC with 24 years of expertise in skin and soft
tissue disorders, congenital anomalies, vascular anomalies,
burns, and trauma.
Dr.
Cullen has been caring for children’s surgical needs since
1984 and is one of the region’s most respected pediatric
surgeons. He completed his medical degree at Brown University
in Providence, R.I., followed by a residency in general
surgery at Rush Presbyterian St. Luke’s Medical Center
in Chicago.
He
completed fellowships in surgical research, pediatric surgery,
and burns. During his fellowship at Shriners Hospital in
Boston, he cared for children with burns involving 90 percent
of their body. At Children’s Hospital of Michigan, he ran
a burn program that achieved nationwide recognition.
Dr.
Cullen has a strong belief in providing parents with comprehensive
information about their child’s surgical needs in an efficient
timeframe. He is committed to seeing patients within approximately
one day of their parent’s call to the office. Focusing
on a strong collaboration with parents, he alleviates their
anxiety and concerns through compassionate support, education,
and excellent follow-through after surgery.
He
is a fellow of the Academy of the American College of Surgeons,
and is board certified by the American Board of Surgery
in General Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, and Surgical Critical
Care.
“Dr.
Cullen has a passion for pediatric surgery that is evident
to all who know him,” said Jim Orosz, M.D., chief medical
officer at SJH&MC. “We are delighted that he has brought
his surgical expertise in children's surgery and skills
in treating burns to our hospital and its patients.”
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
Dr.
Kleerekoper Wins Endocrinology Award
Michael
Kleerekoper, MD, a professor at the Wayne State University
School of Medicine, will receive a prestigious teaching
award from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
Dr. Kleerekoper will receive the association’s H. Jack Baskin, MD,
Endocrine Teaching Award at the organization’s annual meeting in
Houston in May. The award is presented to a member “who has made
a profound impact in teaching fellows-in-training and who is actively
involved in teaching either in a university or through AACE."
This
is only the second year the association has presented the
award.
"This
award came as a major surprise since I did not know I had
been nominated and there are many outstanding teachers
in endocrinology," Dr. Kleerekoper said. “In all walks
of life the knowledge base is expanding rapidly, and medicine
is no exception. It is now not possible to retain all the
information we have learned, nor all the new information
needed for day-to-day patient care. As clinicians, we need
to become comfortable saying ‘I don't know, I will have
to look that up and get back to you,’ whether the inquiry
comes from a patient or a colleague. As teachers we need
to change our approach from information transfer to get
our students through an upcoming exam to a more basic understanding
of the material that will allow for better assimilation
of new knowledge as it becomes available."
Dr.
Kleerekoper served the School of Medicine as a tenured
faculty member from 1992 to 2006. He is currently a clinical
professor in the Departments of Internal Medicine, and
Obstetrics and Gynecology.
AACE
is a professional medical organization with more than 6,200
members in the United States and 92 other countries. The
association is dedicated to the optimal care of patients
with endocrine problems. AACE clinical endocrinologists’ specialized
training enables them to be experts in the care of endocrine
disease such as diabetes, thyroid disorders, growth hormone
deficiency, osteoporosis, cholesterol disorders, hypertension
and obesity.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
This
Week's Sign Of The Apocalypse: Smokers Quit For Pets'
Sake
A
study, published recently in the British Medical Journal
Tobacco Control, represents the first time researchers
looked at the smoking behaviors of people who own or live
with a pet. Participants were either smokers or non-smokers
who lived with a dog, cat or bird.
"We
hope smokers realize that the health of their pets is affected
by their smoking habit, and that secondhand smoke's impact
is not limited just to human beings," says Sharon
Milberger, Sc. D, the study's lead author interim director
of the Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit. "Exposure
to second-hand smoke has been linked to cancer, allergies,
eye and skin diseases and respiratory problems in dogs
and cats."
Nearly
3,300 people responded to an online survey available through
the Michigan Humane Society, Pet Supplies Plus pet stores
and Henry Ford Health System. The survey posed questions
about the animals living in the home, smoking behaviors
for themselves and of the people with whom they live, interest
in quitting smoking and smoking rules in the home.
Henry
Ford researchers reported that:
- 28.4
percent of smokers said knowing that smoking was bad
for their pets' health would motivate them to kick the
habit.
- 8.7
percent of smokers said knowing that smoking was bad
for their pets' health would motivate them to ask their
smoking partners to quit.
- 14
percent of smokers said they would tell their partner
to smoke outdoors.
- Among
non-smokers, more than 16 percent said they would ask
their partner to quit and 24 percent said they would
tell their partner to smoke outdoors.
The
study was funded by the Flight Attendant Medical Research
Institute in Miami, Fla.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
|

This publication brought to you by Natinsky
Publishing Network.
Problems seeing this email? You may view it online at http://www.wcmssm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter contact info@wcmssm.org
|
|
Wayne County Medical Society
of Southeast Michigan.
All Rights Reserved.
|