|
February 16,
2009 |
|
IN THIS ISSUE
Editor's Column: Pharmaceutical Influence: To Be
Or Not To Be?
In My Opinion: Real Change
WSUSOM, DMC Break Payment Logjam
Governor Urges Legislators To Push Smoking
Ban...Again
Immunization Not Harmful To Infants, Says IOM,
Court
St. John Hospital Names Pediatric Surgery Chief
Dr. Kleerekoper Wins Endocrinology Award
This Week's Sign Of The
Apocalypse: Smokers Quit For Pets' Sake |
|
Click Here To Contact Us
|
Editor's Column: Pharmaceutical
Influence: To Be Or Not To Be?
By JOSEPH WEISS, MD
In the first article in the New England Journal of Medicine of Feb 5th,
Dr. Robert Steinbrook reviews the revised code of ethics of the
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). He
notes that the new code states that members of the Association,
which includes every drug manufacturer in America, will no longer
provide coffee mugs, pens, notepaper, stethoscopes, lunches, gifts,
tickets or entertainment to physicians or physicians in training.
Dr. Steinbrook goes on to describe other limits on PhRMA
contacts with physicians and concludes by predicting the change in
gift giving will just shift the approach to marketing the medical
community.
He had only to go to the last article in the same Feb 5th
issue of the New England Journal of Medicine to learn he was
correct. The article, Limits On Medicare’s Ability to Control
Rising Spending on Cancer Drugs, by P.B. Bach, details how
legislation passed by Congress allows oncologists to use non-
FDA-approved drugs for which Medicare must pay the market price. The
legislation allows oncologists, but no other physicians, to purchase
non-FDA approved anti-cancer drugs at discounted prices, but forbids
Medicare to apply policies in place that lead to least costly
payments in reimbursing oncologists who use these medications. Thus
the effect of these laws and regulation are to allow oncologists a
good profit on their cancer drug investment.
Such specific and detailed law and regulations mandating
coverage of anti-cancer chemotherapeutic regimens necessitated the
coordinated efforts of the pharmaceutical industry and the American
Society of Clinical Oncologists. The lobbying likely required years
of advocacy and possibly millions of dollars.
If such pharmacy-specialty physician coalitions become
profitable enough for the drug companies, we may see new biological
drugs not made to bind to cell receptors, but created to fit both
the contours of the law and the specialty physician’s balance
sheet.
The medical community can expect to see increasing growth of
the “pharmaceutical-medical complex.” These marketing ventures will
influence physician buying habits in ways the pen-and-lunch gift
givers never dreamed possible. Eventually another round of
prohibitions will stop such raids on the health care purse but in
the meantime, family physicians, internists, general surgeons, and
obstetricians/gynecologists will fall further behind in their
efforts for financial equality. At the same time, the public will
find that the rhetoric for cost containment will turn deafening as
the cost of health care soars as never before.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
In My Opinion: Real
Change
By ALLAN DOBZYNIAK, MD
Government controlled universal health care will define the end of
capitalism. This will allow government to tax without restraint
since it can always be ascribed to maintaining your access to the
precious entity of personal health care.
The 2.4 trillion dollar health care industry is
greater than the GDP of France. Government will be in control of the
largest segment of the United States economy. Remember what the
Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman said, controlling both
politics and the economy is the road to tyranny.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
WSUSOM, DMC Break
Payment Logjam
According to
published reports last week, Wayne State University and Detroit
Medical Center, after negotiating for over a year, have agreed on a
revised contract that resolves a $12.3 million physician payment
dispute.
The new contract,
which is not regarded as a settlement, requires the university to
provide additional services, which include physician recruitment, to
DMC after which it will receive the disputed funds over time, said
Mary Zuckerman, DMC’s chief of business operations, reported Crain’s
Detroit Business.
Under an
agreement brokered by a state-appointed mediator in 2006, DMC was
supposed to pay WSU $1.6 million per month for Medicaid and
specified other services. However, on Feb. 1, 2008, DMC notified the
university that it was going to hold $12 million in payments because
it regarded the money as double payment for services that were
already reimbursed directly by the Medicaid program.
Share Your Thoughts on this
Article
Back to top
|
Governor Urges
Legislature To Push Smoking Ban...Again
During her State
of the State address, Gov. Jennifer Granholm, once again, strongly
urged Michigan lawmakers to pass comprehensive smokefree workplace
legislation.
“We again applaud
the governor’s comments tonight and her support for smokefree air,”
said Susan Schechter, CSA spokesperson and director of advocacy at
the American Lung Association of Michigan. “Many lawmakers have done
their research and know that in 2006 US Surgeon General Richard H.
Carmona released a report stating the only way to protect Americans
from secondhand smoke is through comprehensive smoke-free workplace
legislation and policies. It’s time for lawmakers to stop dancing
around the issue and finally listen to the state’s leader as well as
their constituents and pass comprehensive smoke-free air legislation
this year.”
With a new term
beginning, there has been a groundswell of support from lawmakers,
evident by the four bills that have been introduced thus far from
both chambers. In addition to the bills, a Smokefree Air Caucus, led
by long-time smoke-free air supporter Sen. Ray Basham (D-Taylor),
Rep. Joan Bauer (D-Lansing), Sen. Roger Kahn (R-Saginaw Twp.) and
Rep. Paul Scott (R-Grand Blanc) is being developed within the
legislature. The caucus will be bicameral and bipartisan and will
ask lawmakers to sign a pledge to work on smoke-free air
legislation.
The governor once again made a call to action on smoke-free
legislation during her annual speech. The governor also called for
lawmakers to act in 2007. For more information about the Campaign
for Smokefree Air, please visit
www.MakeMIAirSmokefree.org.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
Immunization Not Shown To Be Harmful
To Infants, Says IOM, Courts
Although most
people realize the benefits of vaccinations, a recent survey showed
that approximately one-quarter of parents believe that infants get
more vaccines than are good for them, and that too many
immunizations could overwhelm an infant's immune system.
On Feb. 20,
2002, the Institue of Medicine (IOM) released its latest report in a
series on vaccine safety, "Immunization
Safety Review: Multiple Immunizations and Immune Dysfunction."
The
IOM's Immunization Safety Committee
reviewed eight studies of the relationship between multiple
vaccinations and Type 1 diabetes, the autoimmune form of the
disease. All eight studies consistently demonstrated that multiple
immunizations had no effect on the incidence of Type 1 diabetes,
leading the committee to reject the notion that multiple
vaccinations cause an increased risk of the disease.
The IOM also
looked at the results of seven studies, which, despite some
variations and limitations, consistently showed that multiple
vaccinations either had no effect on the risk of infection or
provided some degree of protection against infection. The IOM
concluded that multiple immunizations do not increase the risk of
young children developing various infections, ranging from colds and
ear infections to pneumonia and meningitis.
The IOM also
examined five studies looking at multiple vaccinations and their
potential to cause allergic diseases, which reflect a
hypersensitivity of the immune system to relatively harmless agents
in the environment, like pollens, dust mites, insect venom, and
specific foods. Some, but not all, of these studies suggested that
certain vaccines increase the risk of developing allergic disorders.
However, methodological weaknesses and inconsistent findings among
the studies, led the committee to conclude that there is inadequate
evidence to either accept or reject a causal relationship between
multiple immunizations and increased risk of allergic diseases,
particularly asthma.
Finally, the
IOM recommended that the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services convene an expert panel to examine parents' perceptions of
vaccine risks and benefits in order to develop better communication
tools for them and their doctors.
The IOM
Immunization Safety Review Committee's most important conclusions
were:
1.
A review of the available scientific evidence does not
support the hypothesis that the infant immune system is inherently
incapable of handling the number of antigens that children are
exposed to during routine immunizations,
2.
The epidemiologic evidence (i.e., from studies of
vaccine-exposed populations and their control groups) favors
rejection of a causal relationship between multiple immunizations
and increased risk for infections or for type 1 diabetes mellitus,
3.
The epidemiologic evidence regarding increased risk for
allergic disease, particularly asthma, was inadequate to accept or
reject a causal relationship.
The US Supreme
Court also weighed in on the issue, prompting AMA Board Chairman
Joseph Heyman, MD, to comment: “Three recent rulings by the Special
Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims provides even more
overwhelming evidence that there is no association between vaccines
and autism or related disorders. Vaccines are one of the best public
health accomplishments of all time and have proven time and time
again their ability to keep horrific diseases at bay. Measles,
rubella, and polio are among the success stories of diseases
eliminated in the United States, but are still active in other
countries and could rebound here.
“Autism is a
heart-wrenching condition, and the upheaval felt by parents whose
children suffer with autism is understandable – as is their search
for answers. We need ongoing research into the causes of autism, but
cannot let unfounded myths keep us from giving our children the
proven protection they need against infectious diseases.”
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back to top
|
St. John Hospital
Names Pediatric Surgery Chief
Marc L.
Cullen, MD, has been named division chief of Pediatric Surgery at
St. John Hospital and Medical Center. He comes to SJH&MC with 24
years of expertise in skin and soft tissue disorders, congenital
anomalies, vascular anomalies, burns, and trauma.
Dr. Cullen has
been caring for children’s surgical needs since 1984 and is one of
the region’s most respected pediatric surgeons. He completed his
medical degree at Brown University in Providence, R.I., followed by
a residency in general surgery at Rush Presbyterian St. Luke’s
Medical Center in Chicago.
He completed
fellowships in surgical research, pediatric surgery, and burns.
During his fellowship at Shriners Hospital in Boston, he cared for
children with burns involving 90 percent of their body. At
Children’s Hospital of Michigan, he ran a burn program that achieved
nationwide recognition.
Dr. Cullen has
a strong belief in providing parents with comprehensive information
about their child’s surgical needs in an efficient timeframe. He is
committed to seeing patients within approximately one day of their
parent’s call to the office. Focusing on a strong collaboration with
parents, he alleviates their anxiety and concerns through
compassionate support, education, and excellent follow-through after
surgery.
He is a fellow
of the Academy of the American College of Surgeons, and is board
certified by the American Board of Surgery in General Surgery,
Pediatric Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care.
“Dr. Cullen
has a passion for pediatric surgery that is evident to all who know
him,” said Jim Orosz, M.D., chief medical officer at SJH&MC. “We are
delighted that he has brought his surgical expertise in children's
surgery and skills in treating burns to our hospital and its
patients.”
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
Dr. Kleerekoper
Wins Endocrinology Award
Michael Kleerekoper, MD, a professor at the Wayne State University
School of Medicine, will receive a prestigious teaching award from
the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
Dr. Kleerekoper will receive the association’s H. Jack Baskin, MD,
Endocrine Teaching Award at the organization’s annual meeting in
Houston in May. The award is presented to a member “who has made a
profound impact in teaching fellows-in-training and who is actively
involved in teaching either in a university or through AACE."
This
is only the second year the association has presented the award.
"This award came as a major surprise since I did not know I had been
nominated and there are many outstanding teachers in endocrinology,"
Dr. Kleerekoper said. “In all walks of life the knowledge base is
expanding rapidly, and medicine is no exception. It is now not
possible to retain all the information we have learned, nor all the
new information needed for day-to-day patient care. As clinicians,
we need to become comfortable saying ‘I don't know, I will have to
look that up and get back to you,’ whether the inquiry comes from a
patient or a colleague. As teachers we need to change our approach
from information transfer to get our students through an upcoming
exam to a more basic understanding of the material that will allow
for better assimilation of new knowledge as it becomes available."
Dr.
Kleerekoper served the School of Medicine as a tenured faculty
member from 1992 to 2006. He is currently a clinical professor in
the Departments of Internal Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
AACE
is a professional medical organization with more than 6,200 members
in the United States and 92 other countries. The association is
dedicated to the optimal care of patients with endocrine problems.
AACE clinical endocrinologists’ specialized training enables them to
be experts in the care of endocrine disease such as diabetes,
thyroid disorders, growth hormone deficiency, osteoporosis,
cholesterol disorders, hypertension and obesity.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
This Week's Sign Of
The Apocalypse: Smokers Quit For Pets' Sake
A study,
published recently in the British Medical Journal Tobacco Control,
represents the first time researchers looked at the smoking
behaviors of people who own or live with a pet. Participants were
either smokers or non-smokers who lived with a dog, cat or bird.
"We hope smokers
realize that the health of their pets is affected by their smoking
habit, and that secondhand smoke's impact is not limited just to
human beings," says Sharon Milberger, Sc. D, the study's lead author
interim director of the Center for Health Promotion and Disease
Prevention at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit. "Exposure to
second-hand smoke has been linked to cancer, allergies, eye and skin
diseases and respiratory problems in dogs and cats."
Nearly 3,300
people responded to an online survey available through the Michigan
Humane Society, Pet Supplies Plus pet stores and Henry Ford Health
System. The survey posed questions about the animals living in the
home, smoking behaviors for themselves and of the people with whom
they live, interest in quitting smoking and smoking rules in the
home.
Henry Ford
researchers reported that:
-
28.4 percent
of smokers said knowing that smoking was bad for their pets'
health would motivate them to kick the habit.
-
8.7 percent
of smokers said knowing that smoking was bad for their pets'
health would motivate them to ask their smoking partners to
quit.
-
14 percent of
smokers said they would tell their partner to smoke outdoors.
-
Among
non-smokers, more than 16 percent said they would ask their
partner to quit and 24 percent said they would tell their
partner to smoke outdoors.
The study was
funded by the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute in Miami,
Fla.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
|

This publication brought to you by
Natinsky Publishing Network.
Problems seeing this email? You may view it online at
http://www.wcmssm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter contact
info@wcmssm.org |
|