|
July 13, 2009 |
|
IN THIS ISSUE
Editor's Column: He Should Mind His Own Business
In My Opinion: Improved Quality, Lowered Cost
Could Mean Economic Boon
In My Opinion: Economics And Professionalism
Key Issues On The Table For WCMSSM Leadership
Committee
Dr. Shade Featured On WSUSOM Website
Walk For the Uninsured To Rally Supporters Aug. 15
Obama Chooses Surgeon General, According To News
Report
Detroit Medical News Wins
Fourth Consecutive Award For Excellence |
|
Click Here To Contact Us
|
Editor's Column: He Should Mind His
Own Business
By JOSEPH WEISS, MD
Sandeep Jauhar writing in the Tuesday July 7 New York Times condemns
doctors for “constantly thinking about money” He ends his article
with the statement: “something fundamental is lost when doctors
start thinking about medicine as a business.”
Jauhar is wrong.
Everyone in the medical community must consider income and
cost. Academic medical centers must bring revenue to their
institutions; faculty from professors to instructors must fight for
grants and from income-expense statements prove that they are
profiting the faculty-physician medical group.
Doctors must look hard on their reimbursement if they are to
pay their office rent, staff, heat, electric and water bills, raise
their families, keep their home, and repay their medical school
debts.
In today’s environment of recession, physicians are keeping
close watch not only on their costs but the expenses of their
patients. Can there be a physician practicing in Wayne County who
has not heard from more than one patient a story of financial
desperation?
The New York Times’ characterization of physicians as fiscal
monsters comes just at a time when we most need the public’s
support. Will the public and its politicians consider our request
for payment reform if we seem to them to be Wall Street brokers
carrying a stethoscope.
The truth is physicians think as much about the cost of care
as they do about their profit from it. To further the public
welfare, Jauhar should not condemn us for thinking about the
business of medicine, but encourage us to focus more on it.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
In My Opinion:
Improved Quality, Lowered Cost Could Mean Economic Boon
By SUSAN
ADELMAN, MD
Suppose that U.S. health care resources actually were limited by
immutable practical considerations. Who would be the right people to
allot them? Patients, each of whom would be motivated to fight for
what he or she wanted? Doctors, each of whom would fight for his or
her patients? Or a third party? Who would that be? These decisions
could be litigated or mediated, but too much of that would break
down the whole health care system.
What would be the
way out? One solution would be to do everything necessary to make
sure that health care resources are not that limited. The problem is
that in a zero-sum economy growing health care resources means
shrinking resources available for other services. So, to get out of
the zero-sum situation, we would need to figure out how to make
health care services increase our nation's wealth and resources.
Right now medical
tourism is increasing all over the world. Patients who used to
travel to the Mayo Clinic now go to high-quality low-cost
institutions in third world countries. Should we not increase the
number of institutions in the United States that will attract
medical tourists from abroad and stop the loss of American patients
to facilities overseas? That means helping them keep costs down and
supporting the quality of their care.
Should we not
more effectively incentivize research and development in the United
States so that our health care not only remains cutting edge, but
becomes even more innovative? That means finding out and correcting
what is wrong with our NIH grant system, among other things. What we
should not do is stifle innovation.
In fairness
however, the issue of rationing under the present circumstances
cannot be lightly dismissed. There is a rational argument against
doing joint replacement, aggressive cancer treatment or open-heart
surgery on people in a nursing home, for instance.
Everybody
understands the slippery slope problem, but in some cases the
slippery slope can run in the opposite direction. Greedy
practitioners can convince themselves of the need to do fancy eye
surgery that will restore sight to patients with dementia, and that
kind of enthusiasm may need to be curbed by some outside force.
These issues
cannot be reduced to slogans. They require serious discussion.
Unfortunately, they will not be solved properly if proposed
solutions are embodied in a bill that is 1,000 pages long and
arrives on the desks of Congress on the day it is expected to vote.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
In My Opinion:
Economics And Professionalism
By ALLAN DOBZYNIAK, MD
Why would anybody expect a government program to be
efficient and above politics? Remember it was the introduction of
Medicare, cost-plus reimbursement, the disconnecting of consumer
from payer, tax deductibility of health care benefits for employers,
liability driving immediate adoption of new technology, no-fault
auto insurance diverting trial lawyers to med-mal, and lack of
consequential tort reform that were all government decisions
creating the perfect storm for rampant health care inflation.
The changes proposed for health care are cost
driven.(I believe the true motivation is the power implicit in
controlling the largest segment of the U.S. economy and the most
personal of freedoms.) There is nowhere near enough savings from the
implied improved efficiencies, digitizing medical data, or
preventative care to even come close to resolving the presently
estimated $55 trillion Medicare and Medicaid underfunding.
Professionalism, concern for patients, altruism, egalitarianism are
admirable, heartfelt attributes but of negligible consequence in
economic, cost-based negotiations. Physicians generally share these
emotional attributes, but it is useless and nonsensical to rely on
them in purely economic discussions. Worse yet is to use these as a
ploy to manipulate physician behavior and attitudes in the presently
uncertain health care milieu. Making an economic decision from the
heart is perhaps laudable philosophically but will not lead to the
long-term economic strategy needed to support an ideal
physician-patient relationship.
Before drawing a conclusion about whether a
public-private insurance competition is possible, please consider
the following. Entitlements such as a government health plan are
monopolies. Prices can be set non-competitively. There is no need
for profitability since bureaucrats use our tax money as they see
fit. Entitlements do not need to satisfy customers but create an
isolated dependent segment of society to perpetuate them. They
govern by regulation, and rationing of your health care is done for
you. Innovation and progress are not even part of the equation. Tell
me, what business could continue to exist and be in debt trillions
of dollars like Medicare? For a business to be successful, it must
positively differentiate based on exceptional value (cost, quality
and service) in a competitive market. Profitability then leads to
growth based on innovation and exceptional value. Innovation is
customer driven and supported by appropriate investment.
Market-based health care reform and a government entitlement cannot
coexist equally in a competitive market. The government program will
preempt, but will patients be winners or losers?
Rationing of health care services is immoral and
clearly in violation of medical professionalism. It is not possible
to defend professionalism and acknowledge the appropriateness of
rationing. This is a contradiction. Only patients should make life
and death, and quality of life decisions. Physicians can help
intelligently to guide these decisions by providing information and
expressing a personally identified position. They cannot decide.
Worse yet would be a group of bureaucrats making such decisions
simply based on population data and cost considerations.
President Obama’s recent lecture to the AMA was
certainly off the mark.
Share Your Thoughts on this
Article
Back to top
|
Key Issues On The
Table For WCMSSM Leadership Committee
The following is a piece penned
by WCMSSM President George Shade Jr., MD. WCMSSM members are invited
to share their opinions and suggestions regarding these issues at
the Aug. 12 at 7 a.m. at the Skyline Club in Southfield. For more
information, contact Adam Jablonowski at (313) 874-1360, ext. 12 or
arj@msms.org
By GEORGE SHADE JR., MD
What has been made crystal clear by our pursuit of tort reform with
the local and national legislators against what to us is the
incessant greed of the Trial Lawyers Bar Association, has been
reiterated once again by the President of the United States and the
Congress as it pertains to health care reform in America. We, as
physicians, have to present a stronger, more convincing argument to
the people of this state and this country as to why they should care
about our plight. In fact, that has been most of our problem. Our
argument has been based entirely too much on our plight as
physicians. Now, I would be more than naďve if I were to assert that
we should have no concern for the stability of our great profession.
With the practice of medicine being both our vocation as well as our
avocation, there unquestionably is a strong economic driver that
motivates us to do the work that we do. However, if that is the only
message that we can deliver individually and collectively than let
us heed the sagacious words of Charles Dickens in his classic novel
A Christmas Carol, “…know these two children, Ignorance and Want,
and fear them for they spell you doom…” If we remain ignorant to the
needs of society and focus on our wants, then we shall surely
fulfill this prophecy.
Over the next year as I serve as
your President of the Wayne County Medical Society of Southeast
Michigan, the focus of my term in office will be to make it clear by
word and deed that the physicians of this great state and society
are committed to two noble causes: To remove the barriers to access
to health care and to confront and end the disparities in the
quality and delivery of health care so prevalent in the lives of so
many.
When we talk about access, what
message do we want the world to hear? Webster tells us we should say
that access is “…freedom or ability to obtain and make use of…” The
mere availability of health care does not make it accessible. We
need to address the following bullet points:
-
Doctors
with practices in the neighborhoods where people live. It does
no good to have doctors on the moon if we are living here on
earth. We continue to lose too many physicians from our inner
cities and rural
communities. We have seen too many hospitals and clinics close
their doors, leaving an unfilled void.
- We need to
talk about why doors to practices and hospitals are closing. We
need to talk about why young physicians are making a
conscientious decision not to choose primary care.
- We need to
talk about the “poverty tax” placed on physicians who try to
serve the community. A tax comprised of crippling debt from
student loans long before a doctor ever sees his or her first
patient. A tax of high overhead expenses: Professional liability
insurance, high property owner’s insurance premium, being a
target for crime, the cost of office staff, equipment and
supplies.
- We need to
talk about why attempting to treat the uninsured and the
underinsured is drowning physicians in a sea of red ink. There
is no discount on overhead expenses, no line item in EMTALA that
assures that health care facilities can stay solvent and
certainly no “safety net” for doctors.
- We need to
talk about overly burdensome regulatory requirements, perennial
Medicaid and Medicare cuts. The fallacy of “pay-for-performance”
and “Save Lives, Save Dollars.”
- If access to
health care is truly a goal, a mission in this culture, then we
have to treat it like any other crown jewel of our nation. The
public must treasure it. The public has to insure its
preservation by wise legislation and public funding. The onus is
on each one of us to preserve and make it better for all
generations.
- Our second
message must address in clear and no uncertain language the
commitment of all physicians to end disparities in health care
based on ethnicity, socioeconomic status and where one lives
geographically. It is important to understand that even someone
who is not socially or economically disadvantaged may still find
that he or she is the victim of disparate treatment. Just like
access to care, disparity in care is a beast with many
tentacles.
One of
the myths that we must eradicate is the sentiment that certain
ethnic groups cannot appreciate the difference between caviar and
ordinary fish eggs. The definition of a gold standard is that it
represents the very best in its given category. We should not change
the gold standard of how we provide medical care.
Like
access, disparity in care is closely annexed to economics. Lack of
first class medical facilities, appropriate technology,
technological expertise, a full complement of highly trained primary
care and specialty care physicians and doctors who respect and
communicate effectively with their patients all affect the quality
of care.
Once
again, if we want the public to care about the plight of the medical
profession, then we must be just as committed to its concerns for
high-quality medical care delivered with concern, compassion and
professionalism.
If we
can begin to understand and address the intricacies of access to
health care and disparities in health care, then we will have
finally found the correct way to have the winning argument that is
needed to sway the opinion of the public, government and industry.
The bonus for this effort is the fact that in many ways, we will
have changed our own opinion of who we are and what we stand for as
a profession.
Share Your
Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
Dr. Shade Featured On WSUSOM Website
WCMSSM President
George Shade Jr., MD, was highlighted on the Wayne State University
School of Medicine website. The item read, in part: Dr. Shade said
his goal is to have the organization focus on access to health care
in the Detroit metropolitan area and disparities in health care in
the region. “By addressing these two issues alone, we will be
required to look at several very important issues that create the
problems we have in these two areas,” he said.
“I feel extremely
honored to have been selected to step into this role,” Dr. Shade
said. “I am a native Detroiter and have always felt a strong
commitment to the city of Detroit. The women in the Detroit
metropolitan area have myriad significant health care issues unique
in many respects to this region. I believe that as a collective
force of dedicated and talented physicians we can make a tremendous
difference in the quality of life in southeastern Michigan."
Dr. Shade, who is
chief of Obstetrics and Gynecology for Sinai-Grace Hospital, was
appointed specialist-in-chief for Obstetrics and Gynecology for the
Detroit Medical Center in March. The system-wide position includes
overview of services at Hutzel Women's Hospital, Huron Valley-Sinai
Hospital and Sinai-Grace Hospital. The chief of each hospital’s
department of obstetrics and gynecology reports to Dr. Shade. He
said he views his primary role as overseeing quality, physician
credentialing and patient safety as it pertains to women's health
care.
The position, Dr.
Shade explained, includes adherence to best practices to ensure
“that every woman coming to the DMC gets the very best health care
available in the United States of America.
“Over the past
three decades, health care in this nation has become more and more
regionalized,” Dr. Shade said. “I see it as incumbent upon me to
work closely with the physicians in comparable roles as mine in
other health care systems to make sure that we put an end to lack of
access to health care as well as the problems of disparities in
health care encountered on a daily basis across southeastern
Michigan. I believe I can best influence my colleagues by
demonstrating that the DMC is truly a campus of breakthroughs and
innovation strengthened by its long-term relationship with the Wayne
State University School of Medicine and its time-tested commitment
to the city of Detroit.”
In addition, Dr.
Shade is serving his second term as vice chairman of the Michigan
State Board of Medicine. Re-elected in January, he will hold the
position through January 2010.
Selection to the
board is by gubernatorial appointment. The governor receives
recommendations from the Michigan State Medical Society, elected
officials, industry, and civic and community organizations.
The board is
charged with protecting the public safety as it pertains to the
practice of medicine. Members oversee physician licensing,
investigate complaints against physicians and are responsible for
enacting disciplinary measures up to and including license
revocation for infractions and unprofessional conduct.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back to top
|
Walk For The
Uninsured To Rally Supporters Aug. 15
On Saturday,
August 15, 2009, the Detroit Wayne County Health Authority will host
its second-annual Walk for the Uninsured. Metro Solutions is the
premier sponsor of the event, while CBS will be the Health
Authority’s media partner. The Walk will begin at Belle Isle Casino
at 10 a.m. with on-site registration at 9 a.m. Participants can opt
for a 3- or 1-mile track that will take them around the small island
in the Detroit River. The actual walk will begin at 10 a.m.
The primary
goal of Walk for the Uninsured is to raise awareness of and garner
support for an estimated 280,000 residents of Wayne County who do
not have health insurance, and a growing number of others with
inadequate health coverage. More than 500 individuals from many
different walks of life are expected to rally around this critical
issue.
The Co-chairs
of the 2009 Walk are Rose Khalifa, Executive Director, Metro
Solutions, and Wayne Bradley, President and CEO, Detroit Community
Health Connection.
“Walk for the
Uninsured is a way for the Health Authority to unite a community of
concern for this growing issue which has been compounded by the
downsizing of the automotive industry in this region,” said Chris
Allen, President and CEO of the Health Authority. “We support all
efforts to bring universal health coverage, whether that be a state
solution or federal solution. However, for the immediate future, we
need to strengthen our health care safety net and provide a medical
home for all uninsured people.”
The Walk also
commemorates National Community Health Center Week, Aug. 9-15.
Community health centers are critical components in the health care
safety net. As part of the event, “The Best of the Safety Net”
awards will be given to health center employees who have made
significant contributions to improving the strength of the health
care safety net in Detroit and Wayne County.
The Walk will
also feature a tent with exhibits promoting and educating walkers on
the notion of the medical home. The Health Authority’s purpose is
not only to strengthen the safety net, but also to provide a
consistent point of access to health care resources, regardless of
insurance status. As part of this effort, a “Medical Home” pavilion
will be established at the Walk, offering health and human service
information and an opportunity for those lacking insurance to apply
for coverage through HelpEngen, a tool offered by the Health
Authority that allows individuals to learn more about their
eligibility
for Medicaid and other funding, and apply with relative ease. The
tent will also house exhibits regarding nutrition and wellness. On
top of this, children’s attractions will help ensure that this event
is one that the whole family can enjoy.
Although there
is no registration fee, donations are encouraged. Proceeds will
support the newly developed Uncompensated Care Fund, which will help
underwrite the cost of primary care for the uninsured at Wayne
County health centers. Those interested in sponsoring a walking team
or exhibit should contact the Health Authority for additional
information. Walkers of all ages are welcome. For more information
on participating in the Walk, contact Megan Kolodgy at
313-871-3751.
The Detroit
Wayne County Health Authority is a public body corporate,
established in 2004 by the State of Michigan, City of Detroit and
Wayne County. Its mission is to coordinate efforts to meet the
health needs of the uninsured and underinsured residents in the City
of Detroit and Wayne County by assuring access and improving the
health status of all people. For more information, visit
www.dwcha.org. Or contact Adam Jablonowski at (313) 874-1360, or
arj@msms.org
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
Obama Chooses
Surgeon General, According To News Report
The Associated
Press reported that President Barack Obama has chosen a well-known
Alabama family physician, Dr. Regina Benjamin, to be the next
surgeon general.
An administration
official told the AP Obama will announce the nomination later on
July 13. The official spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to
upstage the official announcement.
Benjamin was the
first black woman to head a state medical society, received the
Nelson Mandela Award for Health and Human Rights and just last fall
received a MacArthur Foundation ''genius grant.'' But she made
headlines in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, with her determination
to rebuild her rural health clinic Bayou La Batre, Ala., which
serves 4,400 patients who would be hard-pressed to find care
elsewhere.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
Detroit Medical
News Wins Fourth Consecutive Award For Excellence
The Detroit Medical News this
month received a 2009 award from the writing group Apex for
excellence in magazine and journal writing. Apex reviewed the May
2008 edition of the magazine and placed it among about 30 other
publications nationally that were also recognized. MSMS’ Michigan
Medicine magazine was also awarded.
The 2009 award is DMN’s fourth
consecutive Apex award, to go along with two recognitions from the
Michigan Society of Association Executives.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top |
|

This publication brought to you by
Natinsky Publishing Network.
Problems seeing this email? You may view it online at
http://www.wcmssm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter contact
info@wcmssm.org |
|