|
March 9, 2009
|
|
IN
THIS ISSUE
In My Opinion:
Physicians Are Afraid To State The Truth
Economist Weighs In On Stem Cell Research
Karmanos Announces Interim Leadership
Team
Fourth-Year WSU Med Student Wins Trip
To Annual Meeting
Health Authority, Primary Care Association
Look To Expand Care
Dr. Lusher Earns Lifetime Achievement
Award
AMA Lauds Obama's Commitment To Health
Care Reform
FDA Advises Doctors On
Tainted Peanut Issue
|
|
Click
Here To Contact Us
|
In
My Opinion: Physicians Are Afraid To State The Truth
By
ALLAN DOBZYNIAK, MD
Primary care specialties have suffered more than others. Regulation
and compensation have moved rapidly in opposite directions. Tragically,
the ability to simply make a living providing primary care is more
than challenging in many locations. With this reality, the following
comments may seem harsh. But explaining the agendas motivating the
development of the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) deserves
clarity. There is no shame in self advocacy, but honesty necessitates
transparency.
Requests
for information. Requests for action. Payments assured.
Payments revoked. Reward conferred. Reward withheld.
Sanctions and incentives systematically applied. This
is where physicians are headed. This is the bureaucratic
nightmare designed for physicians by the financiers of
subservience.
The
PCMH is a smokescreen. It is a parade of rationalizations
aimed at securing budgetary allocations from those who
cannot distinguish between lives and budget lines; by
those who actually believe the practice of medicine can
be supplanted, not supplemented, by electronic methodology.
If there were a Mohs scale for ineptitude and attitudes
of futility in proclaiming value, physicians would be
at the pinnacle. Value in this context has a deeper meaning.
It is not only defined by cost, quality and service but
by lives saved and suffering averted.
Most
other societal groups would have a visceral revulsion
to the punishment already inflicted and planned in the
future for the medical profession. They would engage
more effectively than through game theory. The game represented
by The PCMH is unfortunate. The model inflicts additional
regulation as the non-physicians continue their attempt
to practice medicine. In a budget neutral environment,
attempts to divert compensation from other specialties
to primary care is a fools game. As long as the primary
payer is government, with the other insurers (if they
survive) following suit, there will never be negotiation
without onerous, heavy handed, regulatory mandates aimed
at financial chicanery.
Primary
care is in the power position and can take the initiative
to create change benefiting all specialties. There is
no distinction between protecting the physician-patient
relationship and the vitality of the medical profession.
The two are inseparable. To position primary care or
any other specialty for perceived victory in the self-destructive
internecine battles between specialties will result in
lost opportunity as the real war for value-driven care
is lost.
This
may be too revolutionary to present, and therein lies
the problem. Physicians are afraid to state the truth.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
Economist
Weighs In On Stem Cell Research
By
PAUL NATINSKY
Wayne State University Economist Allen Goodman’s timing couldn’t
have been better. As President Barack Obama prepared last week to
sign an executive order to roll back restrictions on stem cell research,
Goodman, PhD, summarized the economic impact study he did for supporters
of Michigan’s successful ballot proposal on the issue last fall.
Goodman’s
analysis focused on the changes that would result from
a 1 percent decrease in the cost of medical care as a benefit
of stem cell research. The percentage reduction is arbitrary – there
is no proof yet that embryonic stem cell research will
result in cures or less expensive treatments for diseases
and conditions such as diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, spinal
cord injury, heart attack or stroke. Goodman said he chose
the diseases on which stem cell research is expected to
have the likeliest impact, according to established medical
researchers.
The
annual cost of treating patients suffering from those diseases
and conditions is about $8 billion, according to Goodman’s
analysis. A 1 percent savings would reduce Michigan’s health
care cost burden by about $80 million.
Goodman
likened his “impact analysis” to the effect of a “dry” county
that sells no alcoholic beverages converting into one that
does. Changes to the economy, including increased liquor
sales, new restaurants bars and liquor stores would exist
side-by-side with the possibility of increased traffic
accidents and family problems. Impacts could be both positive
and negative.
The
more tangible side of Goodman’s presentation centered on
job creation, specifically in biotechnology. He estimated
the creation of 443 direct jobs and another 354 “induced,” or
support jobs not directly related to biotech positions.
Goodman estimates the total payroll for these 797 jobs
to be about $51 million per year.
For
perspective, Michigan’s state government will spend about
$44 billion this fiscal year; so the impact is not like
opening a few new manufacturing facilities or relocating
a major company’s world headquarters to Michigan. Goodman
did factor productivity gains from less worker absenteeism
and fewer premature deaths, and wound up with total gains
of almost $28 million a year from those two categories.
He avoided considering potential money from royalties and
patents, arguing that such numbers were too murky (some
other states have included them). Ultimately, the total
economic impact he predicted was less than $200 million
per year.
Goodman
did not place a dollar value on the quality-of-life improvement
to those whose lives potentially are improved by the research,
nor a value on the “well-being of loved ones.”
While
the advertising campaign in support of Proposal 2, presented
a strong emphasis on economic benefits to Michigan in its
advertisements, Goodman said the potential economic boost
for Michigan was always a secondary concern to finding
ways to improve quality of life for patients.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
Karmanos
Announces Interim Leadership Team
The
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute and Karmanos Cancer
Center boards of directors announced that effective March
5, Ann G. Schwartz, PhD., has been appointed interim president
and chief executive officer, and Paul Broughton has been
appointed interim chief operating officer.
“Dr.
Schwartz is an excellent choice to lead us during this
period of transition,” said Alan S. Schwartz, chairman
of the Karmanos Cancer Institute Board of Directors. “As
interim president and chief executive officer, Ann will
focus on leading the institute’s scientific direction,
while continuing our outstanding world-class research in
basic, clinical and population sciences.”
Having
rejoined the Karmanos faculty 10 years ago, Dr. Schwartz,
who is unrelated to Alan Schwartz, has extensive experience
and knowledge of the institute.
Previous
to this appointment, Dr. Schwartz served as the associate
center director for Population Sciences at Karmanos since
2002. Her research focuses on the genetics underlying lung
cancer risk. She has a master’s degree in biology from
Wayne State University, a master’s in Pulbic Health in
Environmental Health from the University of Michigan and
a doctorate degree in epidemiology from the University
of Michigan School of Public Health.
As
interim chief operating officer, Broughton’s main responsibilities
include the smooth and efficient operation of the Karmanos
Cancer Center to ensure the delivery of high quality care
at the hospital and all of the Karmanos clinical operations
while continuing their profitability.
Broughton
served on both Karmanos boards through December 2007 and
was a member of the institute’s Finance and Compensation
committees. Prior to his retirement, he was president and
chief executive officer of Harper Hospital and Children’s
Hospital of Michigan.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
Fourth-Year
WSU Med Student Wins Trip To Annual Meeting
Alexandria
Conley, a fourth-year student at the Wayne State University
School of Medicine, has received the sanofi-aventis Minority
Scholars Award from the American Academy of Neurology Foundation.
Conley,
27, will receive a travel stipend to attend the AAN annual
meeting in Seattle, Wash., April 25 through May 2, paid
registration for the meeting and will be able to register
for educational programs at the junior member rate. She
will receive a certificate of recognition and be acknowledged
during the AAN and AANF awards luncheon.
“Attending
the AAN meeting is an honor for me,” said Conley, of Detroit. “I
am grateful that the sponsors have created an opportunity
to increase diversity in the neurosciences, and I
feel very privileged to have won this award.
“The
theme of this year's AAN meeting is ‘Better practices,
better outcomes,’ an important concept that I believe applies
to physicians across all disciplines,” she added. “However,
I am particularly excited to learn more about the research
and clinical work that is being done to help improve prognosis
and quality of life for patients suffering from neurological
disease.”
William
M. Coplin, MD, an associate professor of Neurology & Neurological
Surgery for the School of Medicine, and chief of Neurology
and medical director of Neurotrauma & Critical Care
for Detroit Receiving Hospital, nominated Conley for the
award. Conley worked with Dr. Coplin during her fourth-year
neurocritical care/neuro-trauma elective.
Conley
serves as a class representative on the Student Senate,
is a member of the Aesculapians service honor society,
the Gold Humanism Honor Society and the Black Medical Association/Student
National Medical Association. She also is a member of the
American Medical Association, the American College of Physicians
and the World Health Student Organization.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
Health
Authority, Primary Care Association Look To Expand
Care
A
study, undertaken through the Primary Care Network Council
by the Michigan Primary Care Association and Detroit Wayne
County Health Authority, has identified 12 areas of high
need for new or expanded health care services in Detroit
. The study recommends six priority areas for considering
establishment of new primary care facilities, and it recommends
the expansion of existing health care facilities and services
in an additional six priority areas. The Council's Safety
Net Expansion Committee also identified eight additional
areas in the Greater Detroit Wayne County area that it
recommended for consideration as possible locations for
new health care facilities.
The
Council's Safety Net Expansion Work Group, chaired by Wayne
Bradley, CEO of Detroit Community Health Connection, established
four principles that will guide implementation of the expansion/establishment
of facilities:
Establish
the Primary Care Network Council as a forum for encouragement
and support of expanded Federally Qualified Health Center
(FQHCs) services, specifically encouraging the cooperation
of existing FQHCs.
Identify
and prioritize geographic areas on the basis of need for
new or expanded health care services.
Adopt
a multi-faceted strategy for primary health care safety
net expansion
Encourage
any organization seeking to expand access to quality health
care as long as the propose expansion will not result in
a diminution of services to the underserved.
For
more information, contact Joslyn Pettway at 313-871-3751
or jpettway@dwcha.org.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
Dr.
Lusher Earns Lifetime Achievement Award
Jeanne
M. Lusher, MD, Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics and
the Marion I. Barnhart Chair of Hemostasis Research for
the Wayne State University School of Medicine, will receive
the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Hemophilia & Thrombosis
Research Society.
Dr.
Lusher, who also serves as co-director of the Division
of Hematology/Oncology and medical director of the Special
Coagulation Laboratory of Children’s Hospital of Michigan,
will accept the award at the society’s annual meeting April
17 in Chicago.
“I
feel very honored to be receiving the society’s major award,
which has been awarded only three times before,” Dr. Lusher
said.
Her
major field of work is in hemostasis -- clinical, laboratory
methodology and clinical research -- with particular interest
in Factor (F) FVIII and FIX inhibitors in hemophilia. She
has written numerous scientific articles concerning inhibitors,
their antibody nature, detection, kinetics, etiology, natural
history and management. She has also written articles covering
variations in FVIII assay results depending on reagents
and standards used, and on the unique properties of FIX
inhibitors in people with Hemophilia B (FIX deficiency).
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
AMA
Lauds Obama's Commitment To Health Care Reform
The
AMA issued the following statement attributable to President
Nancy Nielsen, MD, in reaction to President Obama’s recent
speech:
“America’s
patients and physicians want meaningful progress on health
system reform this year, and the American Medical Association
applauds President Obama’s commitment to achieving that
goal.
“In
these tough economic times, the need for health system
reform that provides coverage and high quality, affordable
health care for all Americans has never been more clear. We
must strengthen the public-private mix of health insurance,
and achieve greater value from the nation’s health care
spending. President Obama’s call for greater investments
in research, preventive care and electronic health records
will help physicians keep patients healthy.
“We
pledge to work with President Obama and Congress to improve
the health care system for all Americans.”
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
FDA
Advises Doctors On Tainted Peanut Issue
The
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is asking physicians
to remind patients who have bought peanut-containing products
that are on the federal recall list to discard those products
in a manner that prevents others from eating them. So far
the federal government has announced recalls covering hundreds
of peanut-containing products related to an outbreak of
salmonella in states across the country.
Physicians
can point their patients to http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/peanutbutterrecall/index.cfm for
details from the FDA about the recalls, including a list
of recalled products.
Some
pet foods and pet treats may contain contaminated peanut
butter, including dog biscuits and bird food. The Centers
for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) has developed
a fact sheet to inform people how this outbreak might affect
their pets.
Visit http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/typhimurium/salmonella_pets.html to
view the CDC Web site.
Share
Your Thoughts on this Article
Back
to top
|
|

This publication brought to you by Natinsky
Publishing Network.
Problems seeing this email? You may view it online at http://www.wcmssm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter contact info@wcmssm.org
|
|
Wayne County Medical Society
of Southeast Michigan.
All Rights Reserved.
|